Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 12, 2015 <br />Page 12 of 19 <br />problems, it just prolongs the project and complicates everything. My comments right now, the <br />ones that I've noted so far, are that the property drains almost to the north. Part of it drains to <br />the northeast as was indicated. I can tell you that in a heavy rain, it sheet flows due north right <br />down onto my property, and then we drain it to the Goodhue. Stan Alconis and myself worked it <br />out 25 years ago and it has worked fairly well, but it has always been agricultural. When you <br />start tearing that property up, things are going to change dramatically. Along that same line, <br />there is no mention in this project that I see of the prairie dogs, hundreds of prairie dogs, that <br />are on their property now and subsequently, on my property. There needs to be some type of <br />plan brought forward on how they are going to deal with that aside from importing a lot of <br />kestrels, and I'm not sure they eat prairie dogs. The other item I noticed fairly quickly on my <br />property is the main east -west sewer line that the North Main Apartments connected into. I <br />know for a fact that this sewer line is probably 24' down. In order to access that to put in a <br />manhole requires an excavation of roughly the size of this room. That connection would totally <br />block access to the western portion of my property. That is going to have to be dealt with. I <br />think these are preliminary issues that I should be able to address in a lot more detail and I <br />can't. I am raising them now, more for the applicant's information than for the Planning <br />Commission's information. <br />Walt Oehlkers, 665 W Juniper Court, Louisville, CO <br />I have been very concerned about seniors for many years and some of you have probably <br />heard me before. I have a couple of things I came up with. The first thing I'm concerned about <br />is that one -quarter of the units will have accessibility. I don't think this is adequate because <br />many of the people who will be in these homes will have visitors having special needs to get into <br />their facilities, such as wheelchairs, walkers, and canes. This is very important for elderly <br />people. It is a matter of accessibility. Part of the accessibility that I am very concerned about is <br />parking. I have not heard anything about parking. If you go to Liddy Morgan or Sunnyside here, <br />parking is very limited. There is no visitor parking and it is very difficult. You are parking out on <br />the street. A lot of these residents are going to fill up the authorized parking, and then they will <br />be parking on the street. You have to recognize the tremendous amount of parking you will have <br />out on the street. I hear you talking about having space for them but parking needs to be <br />evaluated based upon the number of cars expected for the different households. A lot of <br />seniors will not have cars but some of them will. That gets to the other point I have which is <br />people visiting seniors and picking them up. If you pull into Liddy Morgan, they have a doorway <br />you can drive up to and there is a heated sidewalk so it's clear in the wintertime. It is important <br />as far as accessibility for seniors and people with limited mobility. Parking close for immediate <br />pick-up is very important. I hope you will take this into account when designing the facilities and <br />the streets. I can't over emphasize accessibility such as showers with handholds and wide <br />doorways. This is part of the Comp Plan here in the City. <br />Questions of Applicant or Staff: <br />Rice clarifies that we are passing a preliminary plat and PUD. At this stage, is parking <br />something we are looking at in terms of a parking count? <br />Russ says yes. There are parking ratios in the General Development Plan, but the specific <br />bedroom count and square footages that actually get laid on the ground will tell you how many <br />parking spaces will be there. That is at final PUD. <br />Rice asks about the accessibility of the sewer and the size of the hole necessary to prepare for <br />it. Is that something that would be encompassed in what we are passing tonight? <br />Russ says it could. There is a memo within our referral comments between the Planning <br />Department and Public Works providing a number of comments. Craig, our City Engineer, is <br />very good at understanding how much room he needs to maintain sewer depending on depth. I <br />do not disagree with Mr. Lathrop. Craig has put comments in the memo in your packet. It will <br />