Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />September 10, 2015 <br />Page 8 of 21 <br />particular site plan does not use that joint access easement that was previously referenced by <br />Staff. DELO Plaza is not included in this site plan. <br />The project has 33 apartment homes and what we call adaptable spaces which are dual use in <br />terms of complying with City of Louisville Live -Work component in MUDDSG. It provides great <br />diversity in terms of generating a commercial use and tax base while providing opportunity for <br />unique businesses. These adaptable spaces are approximately 30' wide by 60' deep. It would <br />be able to accommodate commercial uses and retail uses on the ground floor which is <br />approximately 1800 SF and residential uses on the top floor which is approximately 1200 SF. <br />The Live -Work Standards in the LMC state that no greater than 66% of the development can be <br />allocated toward residential. Looking at our square footage and design, we are compliant with <br />the criteria in MUDDSG. It gives you an idea of the quality we are proposing and the level of <br />architecture and the unique product type. We have been putting out the horizontal and vertical <br />architecture. It has been associated with DELO Phase II proper, 130 apartment homes that are <br />currently under construction. Regarding street trees and sidewalks, we are at a preliminary <br />level. I love beautiful street scenes and we want to develop a high quality street pedestrian <br />experience. As Staff mentioned, on the west side of Cannon Street, due to the easement <br />complex at the direction of Public Works, all street trees from that area were removed. We <br />replaced them with ornamental grasses and other landscape buffers. Essentially, the west side <br />of Cannon Street has a 5' detached walk with no street trees. We originally proposed street <br />trees with the original DELO Phase I submittal years ago. As we get to final design, we agree <br />with Staff's recommendations on the resolution. From my perspective, we need to come <br />forward with a final level of design so we can have a more intelligent discussion about location <br />of street trees, and the street standards. <br />Commission Questions of Applicant: <br />Moline asks about the Louisville Tire facility. They are probably on land that was industrially <br />zoned and will remain that way. Do you have a sense of your development being compatible <br />with the long-term industrial use that might remain there? <br />McClure says when we are in a redevelopment area and urban infill, we want to see this <br />redeveloped and repurposed with high quality infrastructure integrated as quickly as possible. <br />When you encourage and attract new clients, tenants, restaurants, offices, and home buyers, <br />you want to make sure that they are not in an area that feels like it is being redeveloped, but <br />that it is redeveloped. We have industrial -based properties with nonconforming uses that are <br />adjacent to us. We make sure as we go through the process to mitigate impact and add <br />collective value. One key factor seen on the slide is the MU -CC designation. What we hope to <br />do, and can do, is encourage a level of quality and redevelopment within this Cannon Street <br />block that then encourages redevelopment with Highway 42. We ran into this issue with DELO <br />Plaza. We want a high quality redevelopment. By adding value to the west side of this block, we <br />encourage redevelopment of the east side of the block. The problem I am referencing with <br />DELO Plaza is not the quality of its sign or the quality of its development, it is the fact that the <br />properties "cash" flow, and no one is motivated to do anything because they "cash" flow. There <br />are criteria within the LMC that if you don't have tenants for a certain amount of time, then you <br />are forced to rezone and accommodate MU-R and MU -CC and Section 17 and Highway 42. <br />How this particular Lot 4 MU -CC is accessed in the future is a question mark. With this <br />particular component of the development, the preliminary does not impact that. This is why we <br />are so flexible with access. There is an access control plan in place and access points along <br />Highway 42 in place. It is encouraged to have buildings adjacent to Highway 42, not have <br />parking exposed, and not have it look like an auto -oriented retail type environment. That is <br />within code. Without some type of rear interior access, it is going to be difficult to accomplish the <br />City's objectives. There is always a design solution. There are alternative ways to do things, <br />alternative ways to think about process, and be proactive. I think this is an easy solution. I am <br />confident we will be able to resolve the issue. <br />