My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 02 24
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2020 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 02 24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2020 10:38:39 AM
Creation date
4/8/2020 11:27:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
2/24/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 13th, 2020 <br />Page 9 of 9 <br /> <br />Haley responded that in the past the Commission had assigned an architect to talk with <br />applicants during a stay as an offer, not a requirement. <br /> <br />Klemme noted that the house from last month would likely not have even qualified for <br />preservation due to the changes made to it. <br /> <br />Ulm replied that the majority of the public was confused about the various municipal <br />commissions. <br /> <br />Klemme suggested having some sort of graphic that explained how the program worked <br />instead of referring people to the Code. <br /> <br />Haley suggested a simple publication that could be picked up at the library, at City Hall, <br />and at workshops. <br /> <br />Dunlap suggested having a simplified version followed by the language from the Code <br />itself. <br /> <br />Haley was glad that the Commission had increased its incentives and that now people <br />just had to start using it. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETINGS <br /> <br />Klemme stated that all the items she wanted to discuss were on the list of projects. <br /> <br />Haley reiterated next month the Commission would go over subcommittees. <br /> <br />Adjourn: <br />Dunlap moved to adjourn. Klemme seconded. The meeting was adjourned at 8:11 PM. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.