My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2020 01 28
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2020 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2020 01 28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2020 10:49:11 AM
Creation date
4/8/2020 11:33:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
1/28/2020
Doc Type
City Council SS Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1/22/2020 Denver Post investigation into Colorado's metro districts reveals billions in debt paid by homeowners <br />"Originally metro districts were disfavored by municipalities and counties," <br />said attorney Brian Matise, an expert on special districts. "But over time, <br />these counties and municipalities came to see (them) as a way of shifting <br />the costs of public services onto these districts and away from their <br />taxpayers." <br />The watershed moment, Matise said, was the success of the Highlands <br />Ranch Metropolitan District, which was organized in the 1980s and became <br />the largest unincorporated community in the U.S. The Highlands Ranch <br />service plan was eventually amended to allow it to provide most of the <br />services and infrastructure of a municipality. <br />Any thoughts of doing a development "the old way," with cities taking on <br />the infrastructure financing burdens, came to a screeching halt with the <br />passage of the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR) in 1992, requiring any tax <br />increase to be put before the electorate. Voters routinely refused to <br />approve increases to pay for someone else's construction because, as one <br />financial expert put it, "growth should pay for itself." <br />"Metro districts in Colorado exist for a specific reason: to finance public <br />infrastructure," said Sam Sharp, managing director of public finance and <br />head of the special district group at D.A. Davidson & Co. in Denver, one of <br />the most prominent underwriters of metro district bonds in the state. "It's <br />mostly because TABOR limits cities from doing it:' <br />RELATED. Even Highlands Ranch metro districts, which are <br />............................................................................................................................................ <br />considered successful, remain nearly $30 million in debt <br />At about the same time, changes to the Special District Act — the law that <br />was devised for the creation of fire, library and recreational districts — <br />greatly expanded the powers of metropolitan districts by allowing the <br />quasi -government entity to issue unlimited debt as long as the investors <br />were banks or institutions — a group that would eventually include the <br />developers themselves. <br />"Large infrastructure is difficult to finance, and it's most difficult to finance <br />in the private sector. You almost can't get bank financing today for <br />infrastructure," Rau explained. "Metro districts are a very efficient way to <br />do this." <br />https://www.denverpost.com/20l9/l2/O5/metro-districts-debt-democracy-colorado-housing-development/ 33 7/19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.