Laserfiche WebLink
1/22/2020 Denver Post investigation into Colorado's metro districts reveals billions in debt paid by homeowners <br />Homeowners in metro districts frequently say they're caught by surprise <br />when the first property tax bill arrives, often with an enormous increase <br />because Colorado is always a year behind in assessing its taxes. This year's <br />bill pays for last year's assessment, so a new home in a metro district won't <br />see the actual property tax costs for a year or two after the buyer moves in. <br />Homebuyers already have various self-help tools they can use to determine <br />whether they live in a metro district, SDA's Terry said. There's also a <br />paragraph in real estate closing paperwork that lets them know they could <br />be in a special district that has additional taxes, she said. <br />Some say the paragraph is hardly specific enough and others say it's too <br />confusing: "Special taxing districts may be subject to general obligation <br />indebtedness that is paid by revenues produced from annual tax levies on <br />the taxable property within such districts.... Buyers should investigate the <br />special taxing districts in which the property is located by contacting the <br />county treasurer, ... the board of county commissioners, the county clerk <br />and recorder, or the county assessor." <br />There is also transparency paperwork filed with county officials and <br />available online with the Colorado Division of Local Affairs, whose task it <br />is to monitor districts. <br />"If a homebuyer is considering a home in a planned community, realizing <br />they will have more mills assessed for a house than they would in <br />Lakewood or Denver, for example, those are the choices they can make," <br />Terry said. "That's the beauty of a democracy." <br />Tlene Sterkel said that's fine and good, but thinks there's a simpler way: <br />"Why can't they just tell me what it's going to cost?" <br />Like others, the Sterkels' troubles began long before they ever thought of <br />moving in. <br />Eight years earlier, in 2006, the board that represented their metro district <br />issued more than $24 million in bonds to pay for installing the <br />subdivision's infrastructure. <br />Made up entirely of members tied to Oakwood Homes and WR <br />Investments, the board approved bonds that were long-term promises to <br />repay the developers for money they fronted on the project. The more <br />homes they built, the more tax money available to pay it all back. <br />https://www.denverpost.com/2019/12/05/metro-districts-debt-democracy-colorado-housing-development/ 39 13/19 <br />