My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2020 01 28
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2020 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Agenda and Packet 2020 01 28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2020 10:49:11 AM
Creation date
4/8/2020 11:33:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
1/28/2020
Doc Type
City Council SS Packet
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1/22/2020 Metro districts in Colorado have little transparency on transfer fees, community funds <br />"It's like a black hole," Gertson said. "I got stalled for months and months <br />with no answers back, mostly that they were trying to figure out who had <br />control and where it was." <br />Wendy Aiello, a spokeswoman for the foundation, told The Denver Post it <br />expected to file a tax return in November and would not offer any <br />additional information about its finances, except to say it is paying for <br />movies in the community's park, nor would she address Gertson's difficulty <br />in getting any information. The foundation had not provided The Post a <br />copy of its tax return as of press time. <br />That any of the transfer fee money goes to a nonprofit is a relatively new <br />process. Until 2011, residents in nearly every metro district across <br />Colorado were required to pay a transfer fee of as much as 3% of the sale <br />price of their home to the metro district. The entire amount was given to <br />the developer. <br />Lawsuits forced a legislative change so that developments built after <br />October 2011 are prevented from charging any transfer fee. Districts that <br />existed before 2011, such as Thompson Crossing, could continue to make <br />the transfer fee assessment, but had to give a quarter of the money they <br />collect to a nonprofit that could only use the funds to support "cultural, <br />educational, charitable ... and recreational" activities, among other things <br />— and not necessarily in the district. <br />A few metro district boards, typically controlled by the developers who are <br />building the community, created their own foundation, as Oakwood <br />Homes did at Thompson River Ranch. <br />Others, such as North Creek Farms in Adams County, funnel the funds to a <br />trustee who later is to disperse them to "one or more nonprofit" groups for <br />the "direct or indirect benefit of the community." <br />There is no requirement to let anyone know where their money went. <br />' RELATED. Read more from this Denver Post investigation here. <br />.................................................................................................................................................................. <br />As with Thompson, The Post could not locate any information about funds <br />sent to the Florida -based trustee named in North Creek's transfer -fee <br />documents, CovenantClearinghouse.com. Its website only says what the <br />fees are for, not where the nonprofit portion of those fees is to go. Efforts <br />to reach the trustee were unsuccessful. <br />https://www.denverpost.com/20l9/l2/O9/metro-districts-transfer-fees-nonprofits-foundations/ 48 4/9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.