My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 04 15
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2020 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 04 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2020 9:04:39 AM
Creation date
4/20/2020 2:17:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
4/15/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />March 11, 2020 <br />Page2of5 <br />None <br />Business Matters of Commission <br />• Discussion - TIF Funding Projections <br />Staff prepared a brief memo and asked for feedback before revising projections. <br />Previous projections included developments that are now not likely to occur — <br />moving forward, staff will make projections on projects that have more certainty <br />when they obtain building permits. Council member Lipton suggests the <br />Commissions needs an updated spreadsheet; we are looking at spending <br />money. Staff noted PUD approvals last three years and building permits last six <br />months, unless building construction commences and then it does not expire. <br />The Commission discussed how removing previously projected projects will <br />change the available funds for investment and that going forward, projections <br />would be more conservative. <br />Economic Vitality Director Pierce said that prior financial commitments made by <br />the LRC will be incorporated into the spreadsheet. The LRC can then start to <br />align with CIP or TMP projects based on available funding. <br />A question was asked about paying of bonds early, which are funded by core <br />area revenues. If you want to pay off early, you'd use revenue generated <br />outside core area. Finance Director Watson will check with bond counsel to <br />see if that is possible from a URA fiduciary responsibility. The Commission felt <br />additional analysis and discussion about the bonds is required. Bonds grew to <br />$5m, paid down over $200k in 2019. Vice Chair Adler also requested that staff <br />present an updated fund balance with the revised projections. <br />• Discussion/Direction Public Infrastructure Assistance Agreement with 824 <br />South, Inc. <br />Staff reported the LRC provided previous support for project. An agreement <br />has been prepared, though it is a slightly different structure than past <br />assistance. Alfalfa's rebates for assistance were done over a period of years. <br />This project will be paid when work is done and approved. Applicant will <br />perform work and have it warrantied; the LRC will also provide the financial <br />guarantee. <br />There is a timeline for completion so this project will be included in LRC <br />financials. These are expenditures LRC can count on. Projected tax revenues <br />included in packet. <br />With the Applicant, the Commission discussed the inclusion of conduit for <br />potential future charging stations. In addition, they reviewed prior comments on <br />Agenda Packet P. 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.