My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2020 05 06
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
ECONOMIC VITALITY COMMITTEE
>
2020 Economic Vitality Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2020 05 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 10:30:37 AM
Creation date
5/4/2020 10:59:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
5/6/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Economic Vitality Committee <br />Minutes <br />April 15, 2020 <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />Staff will move “information only” to after “acknowledgements” to be clear with <br />applicants the information is not required for a complete application. <br /> <br />Mayor Stolzmann discussed how different pools of funds, using criteria, will be <br />used, General Fund vs LRC. Director Pierce clarified that all applicants will be <br />in one criteria pool and that LRC funding will be applied to businesses within the <br />URA first, but that they are still eligible for General Fund money after LRC <br />money is allocated. Both Council and LRC could be open to providing more <br />money. <br /> <br />Chair Dickinson would like to use the LASER acronym: Louisville Aid for <br />Stabilization and Economic Revitalization. He summarized: <br />• Louisville City Council has $350,000 to give to grant to businesses <br />affected by public health demands due to COVID-19 <br />• Applications will be accepted Wednesday – Friday next week <br />• Grants will be in the amount of $5,000 <br />• Purpose is to help small businesses due to public health demands <br />• There is a limited amount <br />• Marketing must include criteria and what it takes to qualify for the grant <br />• Simplicity – must be simple <br />• Have we clearly determined the qualifications? <br />• Rank – are we able to rank by injury, are we able to rank by type, are we <br />able to rank by year <br /> <br />There was again discussion about business type and if it should be used for <br />ranking. Director Pierce said she would not recommend ranking types of <br />businesses, could cause conflict in objectivity. She wants to be transparent to <br />the applicant. Staff suggested they could go back to the mandate of the <br />executive order and attempt to use critical vs. non-critical as a proxy for the <br />amount of economic injury potentially experienced by a business. Staff felt this <br />was something that could mostly be verified. Director Pierce noted that the City <br />wants applications and we want to see how many applications we cannot <br />respond to. <br /> <br />Chair Dickinson said everyone is trying to figure out a way to be helpful and <br />how to make the process fair and be able to defend it. He suggests if we are <br />taking calculations for injury and take out rank order of types of businesses, he <br />thinks it would be appropriate to award grants to businesses that were entirely
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.