My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2020 05 06
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
ECONOMIC VITALITY COMMITTEE
>
2020 Economic Vitality Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Economic Vitality Committee Agenda and Packet 2020 05 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2020 10:30:37 AM
Creation date
5/4/2020 10:59:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
5/6/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Economic Vitality Committee <br />Minutes <br />April 13, 2020 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />There was a discussion of the program timeline. Should it be a rolling timeline <br />of defined period? It was agreed there should be a window with a short <br />timeframe, 3 or 5 days. <br /> <br />Director Pierce said bond counsel has been consulted about use of Urban <br />Renewal Authority (URA) funds working in conjunction with the Revitalization <br />Commission (LRC). Bond counsel advises we can legally use those funds. The <br />LRC will discuss this at their meeting on Wednesday, April 15, 2020. <br /> <br />Individual grant amounts were discussed. Mayor Pro Maloney likes some of the <br />ideas from other municipalities that Director Pierce provided in the packet. He <br />likes the idea of businesses using the money for assistance with rent. We <br />would like to provide as many businesses with assistance as we can – $5k – <br />$10k sounds good but needs to see what needs are uncovered during <br />application process. Mayor Stolzmann said, given funding amount, the way to <br />provide the most funding is to provide $5k. Mayor Pro Tem Maloney agrees. <br />He thinks we will get more requests than we have funds for even if LRC <br />contributes. Director Pierce said there will be people who are not approved. <br />We will need to provide context as to why they were not approved. <br /> <br />Regarding use of LRC funds, Director Pierce said the LRC can elect to enter <br />into agreement with City as to amount to be used in URA. It is up to the LRC to <br />define the amount of contribution to the program <br /> <br />Amount determined in advance will help with efficiency of process. Mayor <br />Stolzmann noted that the scope of the program, the Colorado constitution <br />prohibits giving money to corporations but there seems to be an exception for <br />public purpose. Should we limit the scope to entities that provide sales tax, <br />contributing to city well-being? And can we make an argument to assist <br />businesses that had to close completely due to government mandate? City <br />Attorney Kathleen Kelly said there are a number of cases where the court has <br />found public purpose finding and that case law can support a collection of <br />businesses to which the City Council wants to make the funding available. <br /> <br />The Mayor would like to use sales tax revenue categories. Sales Tax Manager <br />Penney Bolte reviewed various industry categories of businesses that generate <br />sales and use tax for the City. Director Pierce said other communities have <br />prioritized by type of business. We would have to help businesses know what <br />bucket they are in. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.