My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 05 06
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2020 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 05 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2020 12:16:20 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 10:59:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
5/6/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />April 15, 2020 <br />Page 2 of 7 <br />Business Matters of Commission <br />• Resolution No. 20-01 A Resolution Approving a Public Infrastructure <br />Assistance Agreement between the City of Louisville, the Louisville <br />Revitalization Commission and 824 South, Inc. <br />Resolution No. 20-01 is before the LRC for final approval for the project to <br />proceed. Council member Lipton asked applicant Barbie Iglesias, given COVID- <br />19 pandemic if anything has changed related to the project? Ms. Iglesias said <br />the project is moving forward. The financing is in place with no issues. October <br />2020 was the expected completion date, however foundation work has been <br />delayed by recent weather. <br /> <br />Council member Lipton made a motion to approve Resolution No. 21-01, <br />Commissioner Bradfield seconded the motion. The motion passed <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />• Discussion/Direction/Action- LRC Goals and 2020 Work Plan and <br />Consideration of Business Impacts from COVID-19 <br />Chair Fisher began the conversation saying Economic Vitality Director Pierce <br />has done a good job putting the work plan together and he is happy with the <br />framework. He asked Director Pierce to frame the discussion around the new <br />item: consideration of impacts to businesses from COVID-19 <br /> <br />Director Pierce said that when she originally put these material together, she <br />did not want to ignore the work plan but wanted to have discussion about the <br />City Council grant program and how the LRC might participate. There is a <br />framework vetted through the City Attorney and bond counsel so that if the LRC <br />would like to participate in the grant program, it can be done. Draft agreement <br />between the City and the LRC is included in the Friday City Council packet but <br />is contingent on approval from LRC. It is the City’s grant program, so the LRC <br />would merely participate in funding, not design a second program. Participation <br />by LRC would increase the capacity to provide grants. Economic Vitality <br />Committee will recommend to Council grants of $5,000 each. <br /> <br />Council member Lipton said this conversation went to the grant program but he <br />wants to talk about work plan and tie it into the grant program. Commissioner <br />Adler said discussing the work plan will inform our conversation later as to <br />priorities. Council member Lipton asked if the $700k sidewalk at Hwy 42 is in <br />CIP and if so, we will take out. City Manager Balser will look into it. Council <br />member Lipton said we have not received updated financials. This is important <br />before we start spending money. He said the LRC will want to exclude projects <br />where PUD has lapsed from long-term projections. We should be conservative <br />until we have financial commitment. He suggested we should have a section in <br />the work plan talking about very short term items – 9 to 12 months – to assist
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.