My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 05 06
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
REVITALIZATION COMMISSION
>
2020 Revitalization Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Revitalization Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 05 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2020 12:16:20 PM
Creation date
5/4/2020 10:59:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
5/6/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Revitalization Commission <br />Minutes <br />April 15, 2020 <br />Page 4 of 7 <br />City Attorney Kathleen Kelly said there had been discussions with bond counsel <br />to determine the legal means for the URA to assist businesses as a result of the <br />pandemic. TIF is to be used to eliminate blight and further the vision of the URA <br />plan. TIF revenue is to go into a special fund to pay indebtedness of LRC. <br />There is not a mechanism to fund grants directly. An agreement between the <br />LRC and the City will allow reimbursement to fund grants to businesses within <br />the URA. One of the visions of the plan is to prevent the spread of blight. She <br />indicated the proposed structure would subordinate funds pledged to previous <br />agreements. The way the agreement is drafted, the LRC would have a cap on <br />indebtedness and only businesses in the URA would receive funds. <br /> <br />Finance Director Kevin Watson said the Finance Director would process <br />checks. Decisions of who receives checks will be made by Economic Vitality <br />Staff or a committee, based on City Council decision. <br /> <br />Chair Fisher said he is increasingly not in favor of this. Director Pierce said <br />there will be some reprioritization of the work plan. We can build short-term <br />items into the work plan. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gambale senses that there is value in LRC providing assistance <br />to URA businesses. Our core area is largely in a shut down. He suggested the <br />LRC may want to put out the call to businesses to share their ideas and needs; <br />for instance, the infrastructure needed for restaurant carry out as things will be <br />different. No perfect answer for everything but need to look at different ways to <br />innovate and support business. <br /> <br />Commissioner Tofte is in favor of some assistance. He agrees with Council <br />member Lipton that the LRC start with an initial amount. Perhaps businesses <br />will come forward with ideas that will help them but need to get initial help out <br />then reassess in a few weeks. <br /> <br />Commissioner Bradfield feels this is important in scope of charter to help <br />alleviate blight. Once core businesses are gone, it will be hard to put back <br />together. Anything the LRC can do to keep business entities together will be <br />helpful. It may be good for only a few weeks but this may be the bridge to keep <br />downtown together. Don’t want property values to go down. This is within our <br />scope, and the LRC should take a measured and conservative approach. We <br />should be willing to come back with more money later. <br /> <br />Commissioner Adler said it is important to approve this resolution and support <br />businesses. There are 176 brick-and-mortar businesses in the URA that <br />currently fall into the applicant pool being reviewed by the EVC. <br /> <br />Director Pierce said the EVC continues working on components of grant <br />program; the more strict criteria limits applications. Broader criteria means more
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.