My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2020 05 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
UTILITY COMMITTEE (pka: Water Committee)
>
2020 Utility Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2020 05 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 8:44:00 AM
Creation date
5/15/2020 10:58:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
5/12/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
As rates continue to compress at historical lows the difference between the credit ratings is <br />reducing and having less impact in the analysis. If this market trend is sustained, it is possible <br />this main advantage to individual financing will no longer be a factor. At the assumed higher <br />3.5% rate, the CWCB loan essentially compensates for the credit rating difference and as shown <br />in the table the group and individual options are nearly equivalent. Therefore, there is only a <br />small select set of circumstances that make the individual financing preferred. Given the <br />likelihood that rates will be relatively the same, Staff are recommending group financing to take <br />advantage of the historical practice of excluding this type of financing from the City debt <br />coverage and preserve the City’s ability to acquire addition bond or loan funds in the future. <br /> <br />Timing: <br />The municipal sub-district committee is looking for commitment from those participants interest <br />in the joint financing in the next several months. Under this assumption, loan proceeds would be <br />available this year and loan payments would start in 2021. The City’s 2020 contributions could <br />be limited to the $378,000 authorized in late 2019 for the 5th amendment or a higher optional <br />amount depending on the desired cash down payment. Previous projection have estimated a $2.5 <br />million cash payment. However, the cash payment is being reevaluated as full impacts from <br />COVID-19 are unknown. Alternatively, if the loan is delayed until 2021, a 6th amendment is the <br />amount of $100,000 to $200,000 in 2020 will be needed to maintain progress. <br /> <br />Project History: <br />The Windy Gap Project (WGP) was first proposed in 1967 by the cities of Boulder, Estes Park, <br />Fort Collins, Greeley, Longmont and Loveland. Completed in 1985, WGP consists of a diversion <br />dam at the confluence of the Colorado and Fraser Rivers, a pump plant and a 6-mile pipeline to <br />Lake Granby. The WGP is capable of diverting 48,000 acre feet (AF) of water each year. Once <br />stored in Lake Granby, water is delivered to water users via the Colorado-Big Thompson Project’s <br />(C-BT) East Slope distribution system. However, during wet cycles Lake Granby is often full, <br />leaving little or no space for WGP water. Conversely, the water rights associated with the WGP <br />are relatively junior and are less likely to be in priority preventing diversions during dry cycles. <br /> <br />Additional storage, contemplated since the WGP’s inception, was proposed to provide more <br />reliable WGP water deliveries. These efforts culminated in the Windy Gap Firming Project with <br />the major component being the construction of a 90,000 AF reservoir at Chimney Hollow in the <br />foothills west of Carter Lake. The formal federal permitting process was entered in 2003 with the <br />final permits issued in 2016 and 2017. Project design wrapped up in 2019 and early stages of <br />construction have started in 2020. <br /> <br />City Involvement: <br />In the early 1990s, Louisville developed and implemented a plan for the acquisitions of additional <br />water rights to secure adequate supplies to meet demand. The major component of this plan was <br />securing a secondary supply by utilizing C-BT and WGP. The City joined the Municipal <br />Subdistrict Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District in 1996 and over timed acquired 2,067 <br />units of C-BT and 9 units of WGP. Northern operates these projects in conjunction and <br />participation in one requires the participation in the other. Participation levels are set by a 2:1 ratio <br />for average yields. <br /> <br />Supply and Demand: <br />17
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.