My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2020 05 12
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
UTILITY COMMITTEE (pka: Water Committee)
>
2020 Utility Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2020 05 12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 8:44:00 AM
Creation date
5/15/2020 10:58:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
5/12/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Lipton suggested moving to Tuesdays to have all <br />Council activities on the same day. Mayor Pro Tem Maloney agreed with <br />Tuesdays but stated the Finance Committee meets on the same <br />Tuesdays as City Council meetings and suggested the Utility Committee <br />meet on the Tuesday following City Council meetings. Mrs. Balser noted <br />that Tuesdays are typically full in preparation and updating Council <br />items. The Committee discussed and requested staff to coordinate <br />schedules to find the best day and time that will work. <br />• The Committee continued with the Work Plan by discussing the <br />frequency of the Capital Project Progress Update and agreed to do <br />quarterly unless there is something going on and/or an exception which <br />will be reported as needed. Mr. Kowar commented that the capital <br />project update would include the water rights market value update as <br />well. Councilmember Lipton requested the Work Plan review be a more <br />defined regular agenda item for future meetings. Councilmember Lipton <br />inquired how the Work Plan was syncing up with the budget process. <br />Mr. Kowar explained how the Work Plan is designed to allow the <br />appropriate coordination with the budget process. Mayor Pro Tem <br />Maloney asked about the Financial Policies listed in the third quarter <br />and requested further detail. Mr. Kowar provide the background on this <br />item from 2019 and suggested a review of existing policies for the April <br />meeting. The Committee was in favor of adding this item. Mrs. Balser <br />reminded the Committee of the upcoming agenda item for 2021 rates to <br />be discussed around July. Mayor Pro Tem Maloney asked to explain the <br />terminology on several agenda items. Mr. Peterson explained and <br />started with February Meeting. <br />o Finalize 2020 Rates – Review and discuss the final drafts of the <br />Council packet for the 2020 rate increases. <br />o Windy Gap Update – A routine update of Chimney Hollow <br />Reservoir. <br />o Intro 6-year CIP Plan – The draft 2021- 2026 Utility CIP Plan for <br />the new budget cycle. <br />o Asset Management Software Presentation – A review of a new <br />software (Waterworth) that models utility rates and long-term <br />impacts for complete asset replacement. Mr. Kowar explained <br />Waterworth is a cloud software that’s been developed over the <br />last 3 years and the City is one of the first adopters. We have <br />been advisors for them to build the software and will be moving <br />our Excel spread sheets to this model. Councilmember Lipton <br />stated that the decision to use a cloud space software or Excel <br />should be up to staff. The rest of the Committee agreed. Mayor <br />Stolzmann made a general comment regarding the software risk <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.