My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 05 14
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2020 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 05 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2020 12:23:44 PM
Creation date
5/15/2020 10:59:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
5/14/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 12th, 2020 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br /> <br />would effect that area. The updated sign code required limited hours for illumination in <br />relation to residential areas. <br /> <br />Hoefner asked if staff thought that the South Boulder Road sign would be disruptive if it <br />were on all the time. <br /> <br />Zuccaro replied that he was not aware of a direct impact to any residential property due <br />to the location on the sign. <br /> <br />Diehl asked if the other property owners had agreed to this design. <br /> <br />Zuccaro replied that they had and the applicant supplied letters from them that were in <br />the staff packet. <br /> <br />Rice asked if the PUD applied to all three properties. <br /> <br />Zuccaro replied that it did. <br /> <br />Rice asked if the other sign owners had to amend this PUD again to change their <br />signage. <br /> <br />Zuccaro replied that they would have to amend their PUDs to change their signs. <br /> <br />Rice asked if the only part of the monument signs that were illuminated were the logos <br />and the letters. <br /> <br />Zuccaro confirmed and stated that there was a note on the PUD to that effect. <br /> <br />Rice stated that the Commission had not been in favor of fully illuminated signage. <br /> <br />Zuccaro stated that the only fully illuminated signs were the menu boards, on the inside <br />of the property and with timing restrictions. <br /> <br />Diehl asked if the panel would be internally illuminated. <br /> <br />Zuccaro confirmed that they would be internally illuminated. <br /> <br />Williams asked what parts of the Jiffy Lube sign would be illuminated. <br /> <br />Zuccaro replied that the logo and letters would be illuminated and the back would not <br />be. <br /> <br />Robert Kearney, 549 4th St, Berthoud, Colorado, owner of Speedy Sparkle, <br />acknowledge Zuccaro accurately described the proposal and is ready to entertain <br />questions. <br /> <br />Williams thanked Mr. Kearney for working with the Commission and for sticking with the <br />long process. She thought the proposal was a great collaboration with the other <br />property owners.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.