My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 05 14
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2020 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 05 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2020 12:23:44 PM
Creation date
5/15/2020 10:59:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
5/14/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />March 12th, 2020 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />Diehl noted that he had not been involved in the case from the beginning. Regarding the <br />sign on South Boulder, he thought that the square footage originally was too small for <br />the business and now it was better. He thought the sign on Hecla was more than was <br />needed. <br /> <br />Rice stated that the question was not whether the applicant was entitled to signage, it <br />was whether the applicant was presenting reasonable signage. He thought that this <br />application arrived at that point of reason and balance. He thought that the PUD should <br />reflect that the business hours would be defined as 7 am – 7 pm and limit illumination <br />outside those hours. <br /> <br />Moline suggested language similar to “the PUD reflect that business hours are defined <br />as 7 am – 7 pm.” <br /> <br />Zuccaro noted that staff would work on the final language prior to City Council, but he <br />understood the intent. <br /> <br />Moline moved to approve Resolution 14, Series 2019, with the staff conditions and the <br />additional condition that the PUD reflect that business hours are defined as 7 am – 7 <br />pm. Howe seconded. <br /> <br />Diehl made a motion to reduce the size of the Hecla sign. <br /> <br />Rice asked if Commissioner Moline was willing to allow it has a friendly amendment. <br /> <br />Moline responded that he was willing to allow it as a friendly amendment to allow it to be <br />discussed further. <br /> <br />Rice replied that he would oppose that amendment since the applicant had come a long <br />way and staff recommended approval and to send them back to the drawing board for a <br />fourth time would be too much. <br /> <br />Moline declined the amendment. <br /> <br />Williams seconded Commissioner Moline’s motion. Roll call vote. Motion passed 5-1. <br />Diehl declined to make a motion on his amendment. <br /> <br />St Louis Parish and Commercial Park GDP, Second Amendment: A request for <br />approval of a second amendment to the St Louis Parish and Commercial Park General <br />Development Plan to amend allowed uses and development standards, located at the <br />northeast corner of S. 96th Street and Dillon Road. (Resolution 2, Series 2020) <br />i. Applicant: United Properties <br />ii. Case Manager: Lisa Ritchie, Senior Planner <br /> <br />The applicant requests to continue to the April 9th date. <br /> <br />Williams moved to continue. Moline seconded. Motion passed 6-0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.