Laserfiche WebLink
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br /> March 11, 2020 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br />for the DOLA discussion and felt like people need to work together on this topic in a <br />similar way. She said the community wants to help. <br /> <br />Terence Keane 2437 N. Franklin—He began by thanking everyone for their good <br />intentions. He said he spoke at City Council. He thinks there needs to be a nuanced <br />solution. He thinks people who live adjacent to paths deserve to have access to those <br />paths. He thinks it helps encourage walking and keeps kids off the street. He also thinks <br />there is a difference between crossing native prairie and crossing impacted land. <br /> <br />Gary Mansdorfer 1117 W. Enclave Circle—His house backs to Davidson Mesa. He also <br />thanked people. He was on OSAB in the early 2000s. He asked for a community <br />process to address social trails. He thinks that the trails to gates are a sign of a healthy <br />community: people getting out for walks. He says most of the paths are small and their <br />impact on Davidson Mesa is much less than the clay from the excavation of Harper Lake <br />prairie dogs, the DOLA, etc. He isn’t sure trampling along different paths rather than <br />sticking to one route is the right idea. He also asked to get the community involved. <br /> <br />Lisa Hall 998 W. Alder St.—She said she likes that people owned their mistakes but <br />doesn’t feel a sense of trust. She thinks social trails are good, not bad. She thinks <br />suburban Open Space “isn’t delicate land to be cherished” like undisturbed land. She is <br />infuriated about the approach and thinks everyone should have known this would be a <br />problem. She feels like she has lost trust with the encroachment campaign and the <br />DOLA issue. She doesn’t believe that land is damaged by walking on it. She doesn’t <br />think this land is valuable for conservation. <br /> <br />Chris Hall 988 W. Alder St.—He also spoke at the City Council meeting. He liked the <br />board’s questions. He requested that the Board read the City Council’s minutes so we <br />could read the public’s comments. He said that City communication should not “beat <br />around the bush of the issue.” He thinks the City would be taking away something from <br />people if they got rid of gates. He finished with a plea for public engagement. <br /> <br />Katie Byrne 1111 W. Enclave Circle—She said she bought land adjacent to Harper Lake <br />and paid a premium for it. She says she uses the social trail behind her house almost <br />daily, but says the impact is undetectable. She thinks exercise and the social access of <br />the social trails is a part of the Louisville lifestyle. She thinks there is a solution to be <br />found by working together. <br /> <br />Christie Dualy 2339 Dogwood Circle—She backs to an irrigation ditch. She thinks back <br />gates are a safety issue. She says that if there were to be a fire in the front of her <br />house, she should be able to escape via her back gate. <br /> <br />Chris Pritchard 1125 W. Enclave Circle—Has lived here 27 years. He doesn’t trust the <br />City in their use of Open Space regulation, and included OSAB in this “guilt by <br />association.” He says he has used his gate three times a day and you can’t see the <br />impact. He says the community wants to be involved, and people will be very angry if <br />this goes through. <br /> <br />Jim Hardman—1119 W. Enclave Circle. He has also “lost faith in the City.” He thinks <br />better public communication is vital. <br />