My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2020 06 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2020 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2020 06 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2020 10:26:49 AM
Creation date
6/12/2020 8:30:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/17/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 20, 2020 <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />o Maximum Lot Coverage of 2,978 sf, exceeding the landmark incentive <br />standard of 2,700 sf by 278 sf <br />o A Rear Setback of 0', encroaching 25' into the setback standard of 25' <br />o A Side Setback of 2', encroaching 3' into the setback standard of 5' <br />Leedy reviews the procedures for the meeting; opens the public hearing; and states <br />there are six criteria which must be met for the board to approve a variance request. <br />Leedy states that for the requested variance to be approved, five (5) of the six (6) votes <br />would need to be affirmative. <br />Ritchie verifies the application to be heard this evening is complete, and was mailed to <br />surrounding property owners on May 4, 2020, published in the Boulder Daily Camera on <br />May 3, 2020, and the property was posted on May 4, 2020. <br />Koepke moves and Mihaly seconds a motion that all requirements have been satisfied <br />and the application submitted by the applicants has been properly filed. Motion passes <br />by unanimous voice vote. <br />Leedy asks if anyone at the hearing has any objections to the hearing procedures he <br />described and asks if there were any other preliminary matters that needed to be taken <br />care of. None are heard. <br />Conflict of Interest and Disclosure.- <br />Leedy asks for disclosures from the board members for any site visits, ex parte <br />communications, and any conflicts of interest or required disclosures on the application. <br />All Board members indicate they did not have any ex parte communications or any <br />conflicts of interest for the application. Cooper informs the board that she did visit the <br />site. <br />Leedy asks the applicants if they are ready to proceed with the hearing. <br />The applicant(s) indicated they are ready to proceed with the hearing. <br />Staff Report of Facts and Issues: <br />Ritchie reviews the location of the property, summarizes the applicant's proposal, and <br />presents staff's analysis of the six variance criteria. <br />Staff Recommendations: <br />Staff finds that all six criteria in Municipal code Section 17.48.110 are met and <br />recommends the Board of Adjustment approval of the variance request. <br />Board Questions of Staff: <br />Stuart asks if landmarking make the requirements different. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.