My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2020 06 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2020 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2020 06 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2020 10:26:49 AM
Creation date
6/12/2020 8:30:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/17/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 20, 2020 <br />Page 6 of 9 <br />structure too close to a neighbor such as foundation issues. She supports having the <br />garage entrance from Pine Street. <br />Cooper asks Lowman that with the building so close to the property line, would a <br />drainage issue be a concern to you since this property has had this problem in the past. <br />Lowman says she is not sure about underground draining issues, but water does come <br />from her alley and rush into her backyard frequently. It has not been a significant <br />problem though. <br />Ritchie mentions that the applicant could discuss in more detail the method of <br />construction and how they propose to combat these kinds of issues such as the impact <br />to neighbors. <br />Lowman ends by asking the board to consider a continuance of this application so the <br />neighbors can work more with the applicants. <br />Anne Weise, 728 Grant Ave <br />Weise says she appreciates that the applicant is going through the historic preservation <br />process but agrees that the scale of the addition is too big. She then asks if there is a <br />requirement for two cars needing to be parked across the street. <br />Ritchie says under the zoning code, any new builds are required to offer two off-street <br />parking spaces. <br />Weise asks if this could be waived by the board. <br />Ritchie says if the applicant requested that waiver, it would an available variance <br />request. <br />Summary and request by Staff and Applicant: <br />Barsch says that the hardship on the lot is the position of the church and its footprint. In <br />speaking to general new builds, the applicants feel it is comparable to what a regular <br />new build would be on any lot. Given the hardship of preserving the church though, it is <br />limiting to the design. He reiterates that they will be providing a sewer and drainage <br />plan. They are also open to changing the garage design and believe that entering and <br />exiting onto Pine Street is the applicant's ideal scenario. <br />Ritchie says that staff can continue the conversation of the driveway but she is not <br />confident that staff's decision will change on that topic. If there is a continuance on the <br />application though, staff is open to addressing this subject again. <br />Cooper asks how high the ceiling height is in the basement. <br />Barsch says that currently the basement's ceiling height is approximately 84 inches. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.