Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 14, 2020 <br />Page 6 of 7 <br />who are not. He believes this discussion of mobile food courts is completely different <br />though. A mobile food court would require leasing or buying real estate and improving it; <br />therefore, he does not have the same concerns. He thinks going through the SRU <br />approval process is the best option for these and he favors that these should be subject <br />through an SRU public hearing process. <br />Williams agrees that every application that comes forward should come to the planning <br />commission so that they can get public comment. <br />Hoefner agrees with Williams. <br />Diehl agrees with Williams as well. He then discusses the parking setback and <br />regulations regarding that setback. <br />Moline mentions that the pad is most like a parking facility and that it makes sense to <br />conform to the parking setback to the zoning district it resides in. That would be a good <br />starting point. <br />STAFF COMMENTS <br />Rice asks staff if they have anything else they would like to discuss about this subject in <br />hearing the commissioners' feedback. <br />Ritchie says the commissioners covered everything except she asks if they saw the <br />need for any other special criteria other than the already existing SRU criteria. <br />Rice says the criteria is broad and flexible enough that any additional or special criteria <br />is not needed. <br />Ritchie mentions they want to have a conversation with some regional operators of <br />food truck courts and review the regulations. Staff wishes to bring this subject back as <br />an ordinance to the commissioners soon. <br />ITEMS TENTATIVELY SCHEDULED FOR OVERFLOW MEETING ON MAY 28, 2020 <br />• Discussion of how building height and grade are determined and possible <br />Ritchie mentions that staff has no eligible development applications that are ready for <br />public hearing but would like to plan on meeting on May 28t" and discuss how building <br />height and grade are determined and possible. City Council is planning an agenda item <br />on May 26t" to continue the conversation of how to do meetings remotely. Staff is <br />planning to meet twice in June. They will confirm the dates for June though and is <br />predicting that planning commission will have two meetings in July as well. <br />Rice asks if staff can confirm that the May 28t" meeting is still happening. <br />Zuccaro says that it is still staff's intention to meet on May 28t" <br />Rice asks staff to confirm what will be on the June 11t" agenda and what items will be <br />moving to the June overflow meeting. <br />Efl <br />