My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2020 05 19
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2020 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2020 05 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:15:16 PM
Creation date
6/15/2020 8:55:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
5/19/2020
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />May 19, 2020 <br />Page 9 of 14 <br />Councilmember Dickinson agreed. There is great citizen support for this. He would <br />support a ban as some other cities have done. <br />Councilmember Brown stated he supports this and he wants to ask voters if they support <br />a tax. He would hope this would eventually lead to a ban. <br />Councilmember Fahey stated she would support the ban as her first choice and the tax as <br />her second choice. Councilmember Leh stated he prefers a tax over the ban or fee. <br />Mayor Stolzmann stated she supports the tax as the City doesn't have local authority to <br />do a ban at this time due to the state preemption. She recommended giving staff direction <br />to bring back for further discussion a tax for all bags regardless of the venue at a price <br />equivalent or greater than Boulder's. <br />Councilmember Dickinson stated he supports the ban even though legally it is the most <br />problematic. The ban would have the biggest impact environmentally. He feels it is worth <br />taking the legal risk. <br />Councilmember Leh stated he appreciates Councilmember Dickinson's commitment to <br />this issue, but he feels the legal risk is too high for the City to take on and the cost would <br />be more than we can afford to defend. He would support a tax now and then instituting a <br />ban at a later date if the State preemption is changed. <br />Councilmember Lipton stated he supports the tax. It is not ideal but we need to do <br />something now. He feels most business would prefer the tax as well. He would support it <br />starting in 2022. <br />Mayor Pro Tern Maloney noted he has been to communities with a ban and they haven't <br />been sued by the State so far. He supports the ban but given the risk the tax seems <br />reasonable at this time. <br />Councilmember Dickinson stated Aspen has won a lawsuit regarding such a ban and he <br />would support moving forward with that. He will support a tax at a minimum but would <br />strongly encourage a ban. <br />Mayor Stolzmann stated she supports the tax but not postponing implementation until <br />2022. <br />City Attorney Kelly stated that while there has not been a legal challenge to the ban in <br />other cities, the law is still clear cities don't have the authority to enact one even with voter <br />approval. She feels implementing a ban at this point would be a risk. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Maloney would like more information on what court actions have occurred <br />in other cities. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.