My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 06 25
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2020 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 06 25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2020 4:59:27 PM
Creation date
6/22/2020 10:34:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/25/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2031
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 11, 2020 <br />Page 9 of 19 <br />• An enhancement and new network of trails <br />• A park land <br />• An enhanced area of access and circulation <br />• An improved upon safety <br />When discussing the fiscal benefit, Baukol mentions the 2018 and 2019 annual property <br />taxes. He then compares those to the proposed build out estimated property taxes as <br />well as the tax benefits from Medtronic and the phase one Erickson Senior Living <br />center. There are also additional ongoing revenue and stimulus benefits to the city such <br />as sales tax revenue, lodging tax revenue, and construction fees. He mentions the <br />positive impact on local businesses from resident's income at the senior living facility <br />and the positive employee economic impact through dining, shopping and <br />entertainment. <br />Baukol mentions that there will be no additional tax burden on the residents and goes <br />into further discussion in regards to the development costs. <br />Jordan Swisher: <br />Vice President of Brue Baukol Capital Partners <br />Swisher discusses the responsiveness between Louisville residents and various <br />businesses and boards. They have conducted over 30 meetings with community <br />members, neighbors, schools, business associations, and stakeholders. They have also <br />received over 600 comments from the community and over 100 residents have <br />participated in on -site tours. She mentions that they have had several live public <br />information webinars and a virtual telephone town hall meeting in May. <br />She then speaks on the increase and relocation of the public land dedication and <br />compares the prior GDP submittal and current GDP plan. Based on the residents' <br />feedback, the density has also been reduced by approximately 1.2 million sq. ft. She <br />does mention that further reduction of the density is not feasible for this development <br />though. This is because further decreasing the density below 5.22 million sq. ft. creates <br />a deficit for the project and an inability to pay for the required infrastructure and the <br />public benefits. The density is also mainly distributed in Parcel C along the Northwest <br />Parkway with 48% of the development being located there. <br />Sarah Komppa: <br />Architect, Urban Designer and Planner for Tryba Architects <br />Komppa discusses the key topics related to this proposed design. The first topic is <br />density. She reviews the site history approved square footage. StorageTek's square <br />footage was built for 1.7 million with 4,800 employees. ConocoPhillips was approved for <br />2.5 million with 7,000 employees, and Redtail Ridge is proposing 5.2 million with 8,400 <br />employees. She reviews each parcel's FAR and discusses the anticipated <br />implementation schedule. <br />She moves onto the proposed building heights and goes into detail for each parcel <br />section and what each building's stories will be. She displays conceptual 3D views of <br />the building heights. <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.