My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 01 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2020 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 01 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2020 4:47:16 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 2:14:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
1/13/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />December 16t", 2019 <br />Page 4 of 13 <br />Tanya Johnson, 509 La Farge, was also concerned by tearing down the house and <br />building something so large. Her house was moved from Superior in 1944 and she was <br />personally interested in maintaining that character. She asked if a duplex was legal or if <br />it required some additional permitting. She voiced concern over the maximum lot square <br />footage. <br />Jean Morgan, 1131 Spruce Street, started by reading a note from Barb Hesson, 526 La <br />Farge, which read, <br />have been raised here and am now a senior citizen. 1. La Farge Street already has <br />parking problems. 2. I don't appreciate it when I walk out of my front door and see a <br />duplex. When people come in and buy our older homes and tear them down, they leave <br />town and stick us with the mess 3. When is Louisville going to stop this problem? <br />Morgan explained that she had lived in Louisville for 50 years and that her house was <br />landmarked. She was concerned by the buy -and -scrapes in Louisville. She was hoping <br />that the current owners could add onto the current home and asked them to consider an <br />alternative that left the main side alone. She asked the Commission to help City Council <br />maintain the Old Town flavor and neighborhoods through new regulations. It saddened <br />her to know that a buyer could alter a home and then move on with a profit but leave the <br />neighborhood worse off. <br />Scott Deborski, 565 La Farge Avenue, shared that his grandpa spent 60 years in the <br />coal mines and that he himself had lived in Louisville his whole life. He described his <br />ancestors who worked in the mines. He explained that they lived in that house until <br />1982. He stated that the lot sizes were what made Louisville great and kids didn't have <br />yards anymore. He thought it was important that the City keep its history. He <br />acknowledged that progress is what brings new people to town and is what had brought <br />his grandfather to town. He thought that the landowner should have shared what he was <br />planning to do at this location. He did not think the duplex belonged in the location. He <br />noted that most houses in the neighborhood did not have garages, so residents had to <br />park on the street, and this development would add to the parking problem. He <br />described his life in the neighborhood, including how the neighbors knew each other. He <br />asked the Commission to place the stay if that was in their power and take it to Council <br />if not. He asked them to protect his family memories and protect Louisville. <br />Martina Kuhar, 549 La Farge Avenue, shared that she was an immigrant herself and <br />came straight to Louisville. Her house was on the right-hand side of the property. She <br />explained that she had just changed her home but kept the historic character. She could <br />not imagine adding a duplex without completely destroying the neighborhood. She <br />explained that it was going to block the light coming into her home. She was upset that <br />the planner had come without plans to share to the residents. <br />Michael Deborski, 601 Pine Street, stated that he and his brother were passionate <br />about their family home and that at 601 Pine Street his family was five generations <br />deep. His family had a lot of history in that house. He stated that no matter what <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.