My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 03 16 CANCELLED
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2020 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 03 16 CANCELLED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2021 2:45:15 PM
Creation date
6/23/2020 2:24:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Also Known As (aka)
Meeting Cancelled
Meeting Date
3/16/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Cross-Reference
Meeting Cancelled
Quality Check
10/19/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />February 24th, 2020 <br />Page 11 of 14 <br />Klemme asked for information on the period of significance. <br />Selvoski replied that the Master Plan and Council had determined the period of <br />significance as ending in 1955, since the last mine closed that year. <br />Haley added that nationally there was no period of significance date. The landmarking <br />program was tied to the 50-year mark. She explained that City Council had pushed to <br />have a hard date for the demolition review process. <br />Ulm thought it was a great example of what was going on in Louisville at the time and <br />that it was important to the city. The one -car garage was a great example of the <br />beginning of the age of the automobile. The structure also related to the historic <br />elements of the neighborhood. <br />Haley added that there was a continuity on the street with other houses. <br />Haley asked for applicant comment. <br />Selvoski replied that the applicant had had to leave. <br />Haley asked if Planner Selvoski knew the applicants' motivations for landmarking. <br />Selvoski replied that she did not know but, as far as she knew, there were no plans to <br />make any additions. <br />Haley wondered if Bridget Bacon could do a neighborhood context to study social <br />significance. Haley observed that this period and after was a hard preservation sell for <br />people and having more information could help with future discussions. <br />Dunlap stated that some of mountain towns were preserving more recent structures like <br />A -Frames in addition to their mining districts. <br />Parris noted that Louisville has evolved and changed and this was part of the story. Part <br />of the controversy with the mid -modern homes was that they were not always the really <br />cool structures, but she thought that the structure met the criteria and helped the City <br />tell its story. <br />Klemme moved to find probable cause. Parris seconded. Passed unanimously by voice <br />vote. <br />DISCUSSION/DIRECTION <br />Historic Structure Assessment Presentations: 1000 Main Street, 701 Pine Street, <br />1016 Grant Avenue, and 908 Rex Avenue <br />Andy Johnson DAJ Design, 922A Main Street, noted that a number of the homes <br />around 1301 Jefferson were built by Denver craftsman and you can tell by the <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.