Laserfiche WebLink
document file that can be placed online. In this way, for both citizens and other interested parties, codification of local <br />laws helps simplify the complex research that otherwise would be necessary just to know what the law is. <br />Good municipal codes should be organized carefully and indexed thoroughly. Care should be exercised in both <br />determining the format of the code and in selecting the party responsible for preparing and maintaining it. <br />Resolutions. Resolutions are legislative enactments that lack the formal requirements mandated for ordinances. <br />Generally, while ordinances are used to enact laws of a general and permanent nature, resolutions are used to <br />accomplish acts of a comparatively temporary or transient character. Resolutions may suffice for administrative or <br />executive matters (such as setting annual fine schedules or evidencing official approval of contracts and purchases), <br />or for statements of general policy. <br />In Colorado, state statutes do not provide any requirements for the form or procedure for enactment of resolutions; <br />therefore, no title or number is required for their passage nor must they be published unless, in a home rule <br />municipality, the charter or ordinances provide otherwise. However, because resolutions are still official actions of the <br />governing body, they only may be adopted by a majority of those voting at regular or special meetings at which a <br />quorum is present. It is customary, but not required, for the mayor to sign all resolutions, and unlikely that a mayor <br />would veto any resolutions. <br />Legal counsel should be consulted whenever there is a question concerning whether to accomplish a specific <br />desired act by ordinance or resolution. <br />Motions. Motions are required to bring any matter before the governing body for a vote — including ordinances and <br />resolutions. However, in cases in which the formality of neither an ordinance nor a resolution is needed, a motion <br />approved by the governing body and duly recorded in the minutes of the meeting may serve certain purposes. <br />Examples of purposes that may be accomplished by motion include the approval of meeting minutes, the award of <br />contracts, and the approval of applications for licenses and permits. While ordinances and resolutions are <br />customarily presented in writing, motions are usually not. Votes on motions should be recorded as part of the official <br />minutes of the governing body's meeting. <br />Proclamations. Proclamations may be issued by the governing body, and by the mayor when authorized by <br />ordinance. They frequently are used to express support or opposition in regard to various community events or <br />issues, or to recognize special accomplishments of its citizens. Often, proclamations are used to increase community <br />awareness of certain topics for a specified period of time. Thus, it is common for proclamations to be issued that <br />relate to such matters as fire -prevention month, clean-up week, harvest -festival week, and other similar occasions. <br />Proclamations have no legal effect, but rather they convey the governing body's "thoughts" to the community in <br />regard to matters in which the public may be interested but not requiring official action by the governing body. <br />ORDINANCE PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS <br />Requirements for valid ordinances. An ordinance may be ruled invalid because its subject matter is in conflict with <br />the state or federal constitution, or because it attempts to exercise powers not authorized by the state legislature or <br />is in conflict with state statute. <br />Additionally, all ordinances must be reasonable, fair and impartial, and not arbitrary or oppressive.121 Whether an <br />ordinance is reasonable is ultimately a matter to be resolved by the courts. However, the courts have held that <br />governing bodies are presumed to be acting in good faith when they enact ordinances. The burden of proving an <br />ordinance unreasonable will rest with the person challenging the ordinance, and not the municipality.122 <br />Of course, no ordinance may contain a provision that violates the United States or Colorado constitutions. The <br />Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution places two fundamental restrictions on the lawmaking <br />powers of states and their local governments. First, the due process clause requires the substance of all ordinances <br />to be "rational." Second, the Equal Protection clause prohibits laws that arbitrarily treat against one or more groups <br />of people differently than others. Depending on the group, the municipality may be required to meet increasingly <br />higher standards of scrutiny, particularly if the ordinances touches up the rights of a "protected class" (such as race, <br />religion, or gender) or attempts to regulate a fundamental right (such as voting). Municipal governments are strongly <br />encouraged to consult their attorneys when there is any suggestion that a proposed ordinance might affect <br />constitutionally protected rights. <br />121 See, e.g., Moffit v. City of Pueblo, 133 P. 754, 755 (Colo. 1913). <br />122 Colo. Postal Tel. Co. v. City of Colorado Springs, 158 P. 816, 818 (Colo. 1916). <br />Heather Balser / City of Louisville <br />OrdCopyright <br />by r er Date: ]ois vzol9 COLORADO MUNCIPAL GOVERNMENT. AN INTRODUCTION <br />Copyright by Ci� <br />