Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER FIVE: REVENUE AND FINANCE <br />THE TABOR AMENDMENT <br />LIMITATIONS ON REVENUES, TAXING, AND DEBT <br />In November 1992, Colorado voters adopted the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights (TABOR) as an amendment to the state <br />constitution.231 TABOR revolutionized municipal finance in Colorado by imposing a variety of limitations and election <br />requirements on municipal decisions relating generally to revenue and taxation, spending, and multiple -year fiscal <br />debt. In general, voter approval is required before imposing any new tax or tax increase, or entering any financial <br />obligation that extends beyond the current fiscal year. Also, unless voters approve opting out of TABOR's revenue <br />limitations, TABOR restricts the amount a municipality's revenue can increase from year to year.232 <br />A full discussion of TABOR is beyond the scope of this publication. TABOR continues to be the subject of intense <br />litigation determining the meaning of its terms and the scope of its requirements. Before any contemplated action in <br />the general area of municipal finance is undertaken, both CML's TABOR publication and a municipal attorney should <br />be consulted for direction.233 <br />THE EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS <br />APPROPRIATIONS AND PUBLIC PURPOSE <br />Deciding how to spend the public's money is one of the governing body's most important duties. It is also likely to <br />provoke the most criticism, since taxpayers are notably sensitive when their pocketbooks are affected. <br />Two requirements must be met before an expenditure can be authorized — the expenditure must be for a public <br />purpose, and the governing body must have previously appropriated sufficient money to cover the expenditure.234 <br />There has been much litigation concerning what constitutes a public purpose. In general, a public purpose is one <br />that will promote the general welfare.231 <br />Even if a planned expenditure is for an authorized public purpose, the governing body still generally may not make <br />the expenditure unless it has previously appropriated enough money to cover the expense of the contract or <br />purchase.231 <br />In its legal sense, "appropriation" is the formal allocation of a certain amount of money for a specific purpose. An <br />appropriation serves to limit and guide municipal officials in making disbursements of funds. Generally, persons who <br />enter into a contract with the municipality for purchases or services not covered by a prior appropriation will not be <br />entitled to recover the full amount should the city default, despite the existence of the contract.217 <br />ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS ORDINANCE <br />Pursuant to the Local Government Budget Law, before the beginning of the municipal fiscal year, the governing body <br />must adopt a budget and pass its annual appropriations ordinance to cover expenditures for the coming year.231, If <br />the governing body fails to adopt a budget by the date required for the mill -levy certification, the appropriations for <br />the new year are set automatically at 90 percent of the amounts for the previous year.231 The total amount <br />appropriated shall not exceed the anticipated revenue and expenditures outlined in the coming year's budget.241 <br />231 COLO. CONST. art. X, § 20. <br />232 COLO. CONST. art. X, § 20 (With voter approval, municipalities may "opt -out" of TABOR's limitations on annual revenue increases, <br />but there is no provision for opting out of TABOR's elections requirements for new taxes and debt.). <br />233 See generally CIVIL, TABOR: A Guide to the Taxpayer's Bill of Rights. <br />234 See generally C.R.S. §§ 29-1-101 et seq.; see also C.R.S. §§ 24-91-103 et seq. (public works construction contracts). <br />235 See generally City & Cty. of Denver v. Hallett, 83 P. 1066 (Colo. 1905). <br />236 C.R.S. § 29-1-110. <br />237 See generally Normandy Estates Metro. Recreation Dist. v. Normandy Estates, 553 P. 2d 386 (Colo. 1976) (limiting the plaintiff's <br />remedy to equity only). But see C.R.S. § 24-91-103.6(4) (creating a different rule for construction contracts for public works <br />projects). <br />238 C.R.S. §§ 29-1-101 et seq. <br />239 C.R.S. § 29-1-108(3). <br />240 C.R.S. § 29-1-108(2). <br />Heather Balser / City of Louisville <br />Order #4zzov <br />C36(Ri!Xb&�UNICIPAL LEAGUE 29 <br />opyright by C <br />