Laserfiche WebLink
state statutes. Further, state legislation may be held invalid to the extent the state legislation infringes on the ability <br />of a home rule municipality to exercise any of the specific grants of power under Article XX, § 6. <br />In City and County of Denver v. State, 788 P.2d 764 (Colo. 1990), the Colorado Supreme Court set forth a set of <br />factors to consider in determining whether a matter is of local, statewide, or mixed concern. These factors include <br />the need for statewide uniformity in regulation, the extraterritorial impact of the regulation, whether the matter has <br />been traditionally governed by state or by local government, and whether the Colorado Constitution specifically <br />commits a particular matter to state or local regulation. Furthermore, a legislative declaration that a matter is of <br />statewide concern may be considered in the court's determination, but it is not binding." <br />14 Denver v. State, 788 P.2d 764 (Colo. 1990); Walgreen Co. v. Charnes, 819 P.2d 1039 (Colo. 1991); Voss v. Lundvall Bros., Inc., 830 <br />P.2d 1061 (Colo. 1992); City of Commerce City v. State, 40 P.3d 1273 (Colo. 2002). <br />Heather Balser / City of Louisville <br />Order #azzov <br />CQ 3T6 Xb&� UNICIPAL LEAGUE <br />opyright by C <br />