Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville Local Licensing Authority <br />Meeting Date: June 26, 2000 <br /> <br />Deputy City Clerk Bolte responded that to her knowledge misdemeanor charges are not <br />considered as relevant as felony charges in the license process, however, she would confer with <br />the Authority Secretary, Nancy Varra to determine the proper course of action. <br /> <br />Attorney Kelly agreed that a misdemeanor charge alone may not be relevant, however, if there <br />were a finding of guilt or deferred sentence issued relative to the charge, the applicant' s response <br />of "no" to question 4/22 on the individual history application would not be truthful and therefore <br />subject to questioning by the Authority. <br /> <br />The Authority requested the Deputy City Clerk and Authority Attorney to jointly research the <br />current status of previous charges filed against both Michael G. Davis and Holly M. Ortiz prior <br />to the public hearing scheduled for July 31, 2000. <br /> <br />Member Kimmett requested Deputy City Clerk Bolte to advise the applicant that a revised lease <br />agreement would be necessary prior to their scheduled public hearing. Kimmett noted that the <br />lease is only valid through May 31, 2001 and needs to show possession through July of 2001 at a <br />minimum. <br /> <br />Member Turner asked if the applicants had requested a continuance based on unresolved sales <br />tax issues. Authority Attorney Kelly stated it was her understanding that they were simply not <br />ready to make their presentation. Deputy City Clerk Bolte stated that due to an administrative <br />error the applicant was not notified until Friday, June 23rd of additional information provided to <br />the Authority by Dianne Ray, Director of Finance. <br /> <br />Attorney Kelly informed the Authority that results of an investigation must be provided to the <br />applicant of a new or renewal liquor license application five (5) days prior to review. To <br />accomplish this requirement, a letter was drafted by the Authority Attorney and forwarded to the <br />Authority Secretary and Deputy City Clerk for implementation. <br /> <br />Member Evans asked about terminology used in the letter submitted by Dianne Ray with respect <br />to the "short check" notations. Attorney Kelly stated that she could not answer for the Director, <br />but that Dianne Ray would be present at the July 31, 2000 public hearing to answer Authority <br />questions. <br /> <br />ge <br /> <br />Renewal Application - Hei Han Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Henry's Bar & Grill - Tavern <br />Liquor License - 935 Pine Street. <br /> <br />Chairperson Myers reminded the Authority that this item was removed from the consent agenda <br />and placed under Authority Business earlier in the meeting. <br /> <br />Members briefly discussed a DWA! conviction received by the current licensee within the last <br />year. Authority Attorney Kelly advised the Authority that while a serious charge, based on her <br />research of case law it is not sufficient grounds by itself, for denying the renewal. She read for <br />members a court ruling Hartman v. Wadlow, 545 P.2d 735 (Colo. App. 1975), which states that <br /> <br /> <br />