My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2019 01 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2019 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2019 01 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:16:47 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 10:58:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
1/10/2019
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 10, 2019 <br />Page 6 of 16 <br />Cindy Bedell, 662 West Willow Street in Louisville, stated that the mass and scale of <br />this proposal was better than the past application. She still did not think that the two- <br />story section fit in the downtown area. She noted that there was a jolting height contrast <br />between the two-story structure and the one-story neighbors. Bedell suggested that the <br />eye line could be improved by softening the roof on the northern section with a gabled <br />roof or architectural features added to the top like the State Mercantile building. This <br />was an iconic location and she thought we should take our time to get a design that fits <br />and enhances the historic downtown. <br />Moline asked about parking lots being obsolete by 2030 and wondered if the <br />Transportation Management Plan would be looking at parking. <br />Zuccaro replied that the Transportation Master Plan would not be looking at parking <br />policy, however the update to the Commercial and Industrial Design Guidelines will look <br />at parking, but not for downtown. Policy work downtown would require a City Council <br />work plan to look at that item. <br />Moline asked if staff had done downtown parking studies recently. <br />Zuccaro replied that there had been several studies over the years to make <br />recommendations on acquisitions and promoting biking and walking to implement the <br />previous planning efforts to provide more public parking. <br />Brauneis asked where most of the newly purchased parking spots came from. <br />Zuccaro responded that the numbers came from the three areas around DELO, Lucky <br />Pie, and the Corner. <br />Brauneis asked Mr. Sinkey for his thoughts on the fee -in -lieu amount of $18,000 per <br />space. <br />Sinkey replied that creating a parking space in a small garage downtown would cost <br />about $40,000 per space. However, the fee -in -lieu payments were for parking spaces <br />that did not have leasable benefits for the tenants. He noted that there were many <br />approved PUDs in town that were not being built largely because the economics did not <br />support it. But in the scheme of things, $18,000 for a space was probably fair. <br />Brauneis closed public comment and opened commissioner discussion. <br />Hoefner stated that the Commission did not have a lot of direction from Council about <br />what they did not like about the previous proposal. That said, the changes to the <br />application do respond to the concerns from the Commission and the public from the <br />last proposal. <br />Moline appreciated the street music concept. He agreed that the northern portion did <br />feel a bit out of place, but thought that it might help offset the two-story building from the <br />historic buildings. He thought the massing had been improved and was no longer a <br />problem. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.