My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2019 01 10
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2019 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2019 01 10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:16:47 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 10:58:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
1/10/2019
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 10, 2019 <br />Page 8 of 16 <br />is not required to get that consent before rezoning. The proposed rezoning is consistent <br />with the properties to the west as well as the uses on the site. <br />Staff finds that the application meets criterion 1 in Section 17.44.050 and that the other <br />criteria are not applicable. Criterion 1 reads, "The land to be rezoned was zoned in error <br />and as presently zoned is inconsistent with the policies and goals of the city's <br />comprehensive plan." It also appears that the original zoning was done in error since it <br />was repealed later. <br />Hsu asked why staff was proposing to change the zone to Agriculture instead of <br />Business Office, which was also near the property. <br />Ritchie stated that the Business Office zone was inconsistent with the current use and <br />the projected use of the area. <br />Hsu asked if there were any agricultural uses, such as crop -growing, in the area. <br />Ritchie replied that the zone was the closest fit among the zoning options, but no crop - <br />growing is occurring in the area. <br />Hsu asked why they were not recommending the Open Space zone district. <br />Ritchie replied that OS staff thought that the agricultural zone was a better fit at this <br />time. Also, the Open Space zone was very restrictive to change and any future zoning <br />changes from Open Space would require a vote from Louisville residents. <br />Brauneis asked for additional questions of staff. Seeing none, he asked for <br />commissioner comments. <br />Hsu did not think that agriculture was a perfect fit but it made more sense than any <br />other zone. Office space was a suitable use for the other area. <br />Williams made a motion to approve Resolution 19, Series 2018. Roll call vote. All in <br />favor. <br />Davidson Highline Replat 2 — A request for a replat of Davidson Highline Replat <br />subdivision, Lots 1A and 2A to adjust the lot boundaries of Lots 1A and 2A, <br />vacate Tract Q, Takoda subdivision, and create Outlot A (Resolution No 2, Series <br />2019). <br />• Applicant: City of Louisville. <br />• Case Manager: Lisa Ritchie, Senior Planner <br />Williams disclosed that she lived near the block in question but confirmed that she could <br />be fair. <br />The application met all public notice requirements on December 23rd and December <br />21 st, 2018. <br />Ritchie presented the proposal, one of the purposes of which was to create an outlot <br />that the City could purchase from the property owner in accordance with the Regional <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.