My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2019 04 11
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2019 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2019 04 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:17:24 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 10:58:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
4/11/2019
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 11, 2019 <br />Page 3 of 10 <br />Ritchie replied that the community was okay with signs that were a little bigger. 10% on <br />height would be a lot since the height allowance was already high, but an increase <br />beyond 10% for area could be acceptable. She suggested that they could increase the <br />percentage or they could scale back on the by -right option and leave the 20% on area <br />or scale back on the by -right signage size with the increase to 20% as the incentive. <br />Brauneis noted that scaling back the by -right seemed like penalizing people who <br />wanted to be involved in the Master Sign Program. <br />Zuccaro stated that staff would bring additional information on this issue to the <br />Commission. <br />Areas in Louisville <br />Ritchie presented the different areas in the sign plan: residential, commercial, industrial, <br />mixed -used, and downtown. She noted that the downtown area was experiencing the <br />least changes to signage criteria, since the City did not receive many waiver requests <br />for the downtown area. <br />Sandwich board signs <br />Ritchie asked for feedback on where businesses could put their sandwich boards vis-a- <br />vis the location of their business and allowing sandwich boards outside of downtown. <br />Rice asked if there were any caps on the total number of sandwich boards and voiced a <br />concern for having too many of them on sidewalks. <br />Zuccaro replied that the allowances to have a sandwich board away from your <br />storefront would only apply to alley -access businesses and a couple of private <br />pedestrian alleyways downtown. The proposed language did not allow second -story <br />businesses to have sandwich boards. He added that there was no cap on the total <br />number of sandwich boards. <br />Brauneis thought it was excessive for businesses on Front Street to advertise on Main <br />Street. <br />Moline asked for the rationale that business owners used to request allowing <br />businesses on other streets to put their signs on Main Street. <br />Ritchie responded that these businesses largely made the argument that their signs <br />were more effective if they were on Main Street. <br />Hoefner stated that he was sympathetic to the alley -fronted businesses. While those <br />businesses knew they were going to have to operate in an alley, he liked the character <br />of the alleyways and wanted to help encourage businesses there. He agreed that there <br />should be limitations on where sandwich boards could be. <br />Rice noted that these could be considered de facto permanent signs even if they had to <br />be taken in every night. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.