My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2019 04 11
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2019 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2019 04 11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:17:24 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 10:58:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
4/11/2019
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 11, 2019 <br />Page 5 of 10 <br />Flags <br />Ritchie described the changes to the flag criteria, since they could no longer be <br />regulated by content. The new criteria included size restrictions and number of flag <br />restrictions. <br />Electronic Message Centers <br />Ritchie noted that school signs were exempt from City regulations. <br />Brauneis stated that he felt the fewer of these the better and noted that they could <br />contribute to residential light pollution. <br />Hoefner stated that gas stations did not bother him but other types of EMCs should go <br />through a PUD. He did not support anything that flashed or moved through images too <br />quickly. <br />Brauneis noted that the messaging speed for some of these signs was set at an optimal <br />speed to get messages across to people driving by. <br />Ritchie stated that there are different regulations for not distracting drivers and it was <br />important to consider who they were trying to create a message for. <br />Moline appreciated the detail, but he was a little worried that enforcement might be <br />difficult and suggested moving some of the criteria to guidelines. <br />Ritchie responded that staff could dial back some of the specifics if the Commission <br />decided to keep it as a PUD process only. <br />Rice stated that keeping it as a PUD only would allow City control while also not trying <br />to write a one -size -fits -all set of criteria. <br />Zuccaro added that the community feedback was generally not comfortable with <br />promoting these kinds of signs. <br />Brauneis asked about the gas station and menu board signs. <br />Zuccaro replied that those kinds of signs would be exempted. <br />Howe stated that making it different for the downtown area was that it was a <br />disadvantage to a business downtown. <br />Ritchie replied that EMCs were not allowed downtown as menu boards. <br />Rice stated that the EMCs did not seem "compatible" with downtown. He agreed with <br />Chair Brauneis that he wanted fewer of these signs, not more. <br />Zuccaro summarized that the Commission suggested keeping it as a PUD only and <br />cutting back on the specificity in the criteria. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.