Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 9, 2014 <br />Page 4 of 14 <br />McCartney says the applicant wants the garages excluded so the square footage can be in the <br />house. <br />Moline asks about the appraisal price for the lots. <br />McCartney says it was obtained independently. <br />Moline asks about the Cultural Resource Survey and wonders if this is a normal requirement. <br />McCartney says in Section 17.28.120, it says to treat the site sensitively if there are historical <br />elements. It is not a requirement but Staff asked for it and the applicant agreed to it. <br />Moline asks about the right-of-way line by the park. <br />McCartney shows the park which is a 15' linear park. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Applicant, Owner, and Representative: Nest Builders. Reid Phillips, 111 West Cannon Street, <br />Lafayette, CO 80027 <br />• Nest Builders is a local company with an office in Louisville. They specialize in building <br />out small communities of homes and in -fill projects such as this. Hutchinson is their first <br />project in Louisville but they have built all over Colorado. The company is not only the <br />developer but the builder so the intricate work and information involved is something <br />they add to the process. <br />• Phillips clarifies that the park being dedicated just a sliver of the actual linear park. The <br />actual maintenance to be carried on by the City of Louisville once the two year period is <br />over 2300 SF overall. <br />• The park dedication removes actual land from the lots. With the RM district and multi- <br />family, the company could have built 19,401 SF of floor area ratio (FAR). The current <br />proposed without the garages is 16,240 SF which is less. They are asking to build 22' x <br />22' garages which are 484 SF per lot. The general homes being built are 2,780 SF so <br />they are not using all the FAR being requested. <br />• Material boards were submitted. Rice makes motion, Russell seconds, passed by voice <br />vote. <br />Commission Questions of Applicant: <br />Rice asks about the building height and the waiver. <br />Phillips says the reason for the building height waiver is to move from a dormer system to a <br />more traditional two-story with a roof. Traditionally under 27' and to get the level of space <br />upstairs, a dormer is used. In this type of home, we like to split the systems so there is a <br />mechanical system in the attic with AC and furnace and a smaller system in the basement. In a <br />dormer system, there is no room for the mechanical system. By allowing for the extra couple of <br />inches, we can go to a more traditional roof system with room for the mechanical system as well <br />as meeting insulation values. These homes will be fire -sprinkled homes and will need extra <br />protection over the fire sprinklers such as insulation values since they can freeze. <br />Moline asks about the company having experience building above former mines and concerns <br />about subsidence. <br />Phillips says that in addition to the due diligence done by the original developer, they went <br />further with another company familiar with Louisville. They bore down to the actual mine shafts <br />to see if the mine has collapsed. The mine cap on site has sunk down and there has been <br />subsidence. <br />Moline asks if there is company liability 10 to 20 years down the road. Is there any retained <br />liability. <br />Phillips says the Colorado Statutes of Limitations states that 20 years would be beyond that. <br />The homeowners must be notified of the risk. Phillips says that the company contacted the <br />Colorado Geologic Society and the 50' setback is their requirement for a mitigated mine shaft. If <br />it was un-mitigated, the requirement would be 100'. <br />