My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 01 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2015 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 01 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:23:50 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:19:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
1/8/2015
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />January 8, 2015 <br />Page 6 of 23 <br />BCHA development is estimated to result in approximately $150,000 in ongoing annual revenue <br />to the City and to generate approximately $264, 000 ongoing annual expenditures. The result is a <br />net fiscal on -going operations balance of negative $114,000 annually. There is expected to be an <br />annual recurring revenue stream of $29,000 from sales tax revenue that is dedicated to capital <br />projects, open space, and historic preservation. Therefore, the total net on -going fiscal balance <br />will be negative by $85,000. The proposed development will have a net negative capital impact <br />based on the model factors. The development will impose $2,104, 000 upon the City in demand <br />for new capital investments. The project is estimated to generate $1,340,000 in one-time <br />revenue. Thus, the net fiscal balance provides a one-time capital negative impact of $764, 000. <br />Although there is not a large retail component to this project, EPS believes it will have a positive <br />impact on the Christopher Plaza commercial center at the northwest corner of South Boulder <br />Road and Hwy 42." <br />Additional outside communication: <br />Email to Planning Department from Alexandra Bradley received on Wednesday, January 7, <br />2015 regarding BCHA Annexation and Rezoning Application. Motion made by Brauneis to enter <br />email into the record, seconded by Moline. Passed by voice vote. <br />Commission Questions of Staff. <br />Russell asks about Hecla and whether there is a traffic signal there. <br />Russ says there is no traffic signal at Hecla at this time. It is a T-intersection. <br />Tengler asks about Planning Area A being zoning commercial, not commercial/residential. Has <br />this changed. <br />Russ says in GDP, it should be Commercial/Residential. Last minute fixes to the GDP and the <br />Staff Report may not have reflected it in the graphic referenced. <br />Tengler asks about fiscal analysis. At what point does Staff think a negative fiscal balance <br />would have impacted the decision for approval. <br />Russ says it is not sole determinate of any development. This is BCHA coming with a proposal. <br />Staff recognizes the diversity of affordable housing. <br />Brauneis asks about LES enrollment projection. The 106% projection is concerning but he <br />assumes this is projection unabated. The discussion with City Council and BVSD will hopefully <br />address this projection. <br />Russ says should the possibility of the projections materialize in the future, BVSD has several <br />actions that they can take to meet it. Old Town Louisville is difficult for BVSD to understand. <br />Moline asks about public land dedication, is there a park site or trail corridor the Comp Plan <br />identified for this location that the community and staff would want? <br />Russ says there is the number of plans for the trail corridor (Lake to Lake Trail). Louisville has a <br />partnership with Boulder County Transportation to set aside $600,000 for an underpass at <br />Highway 42 at the northwest quadrant of this parcel. The Comp Plan does not identify a park <br />location. <br />Moline says this development has to be amended and added to the Takota GDP. Did the <br />Takota GDP have a limit on number of units? <br />Russ says it had a maximum. This property is too small to come in as an independent GDP so <br />it needs to be attached. It could have been attached to the Alvenus GDP (Balfour) or Takota or <br />Steel Ranch South. Staff thought the Takota was best. <br />Moline says although this is added to Takota GDP, does it not need to abide by unit limits? <br />Russ says it can be viewed as an amendment to that GDP particular to this parcel. <br />O'Connell asks if any of the adjacent property owners had any objections. <br />Russ says he has not heard of any objections. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.