My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 04 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2015 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 04 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:24:24 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:19:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
4/9/2015
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 9, 2015 <br />Page 14 of 27 <br />commercial structures up front. It would not change heights. It would allow a lower density than <br />is currently allowed to be considered. Currently, multi -family is allowed to be considered and <br />single family is not allowed to be considered as part of the Downtown Zoning District. He does <br />not believe it will change the intensity of Downtown. The effect will actually change the <br />difference. It will give economic opportunity for lower density to have viable uses. Staff knows <br />that what is done to Chapter 17 will affect Chapter 13. Staff does not believe this affects this <br />particular issue in Chapter 16, but Staff is aware of Chapter 13. Draft ordinances have been <br />sent to the Finance Director who runs utility billing as well as Water Engineer and Public Works <br />Director modifying some of the water ordinances that require separate distinct taps. Under one <br />owner such as a shopping center with multiple tenants, the Code reads every premise needs a <br />separate connection. There is no ordinance for Live -Work. The Finance Director has reviewed it <br />from a public utility billing perspective and is comfortable requiring only one tap to serve a <br />building. The Water and Resource Engineer as well as the City's Public Works Director both <br />feel comfortable that this would not impact water supply. There is consensus among all of them <br />that the water rates would be charged at a commercial rate, not residential rate. These types of <br />ordinances will be married under City Council. <br />Camilla W. Donnelly, 2366 Senator Court, Louisville, CO <br />She may be confused but the Downtown has grown in a nice way over the last 10-12 years. <br />She wonders if we might have more control if people have to "ask" to do things, rather than start <br />tweaking with it. Perhaps she is misunderstanding things but we are suddenly trying to do <br />Work -Family rather than focusing on the commercial. She looks at Bittersweet and how they <br />moved back with a lot of commercial things that bring people from outside. This is where we get <br />our tax dollars. She thinks most people don't work in Louisville, but work outside. It seems like <br />a strange thing to start doing now. <br />Barney Funk, 1104 Hillside Lane, Louisville, CO <br />He thinks this is an excellent idea. There is a town in western PA called Ligonier, PA. It has <br />Work -Live standards in its town. In the center of town, there is a Main Street coming in north - <br />south, and a street running east -west, and they have Live -Work homes on the Main Streets and <br />the sub -streets leading in. It has created Work -Life home environments where the owner of the <br />property and the resident of the Live part own a piano store giving lessons, an antique store, a <br />gift store, and a florist. There are little stores east and west, north and south, and it brings in a <br />lot of additional sales tax to the community. It brings in a home environment. He didn't think <br />Louisville was thinking about it, but he compliments you. To do any research, the zip code is <br />15658, Ligonier, PA. It is 60 miles east of Pittsburgh. They have this and it is working very well. <br />Laurie Bija, 3169 Oak Circle North, Broomfield, CO <br />She is attending for a school assignment. She highly supports this. It supports a reduction of <br />sprawl for people coming into Louisville and causing more traffic and commotion. If they can live <br />where they are actually employed, it is very awesome. Well done, Louisville. <br />Closed Public Hearing and discussion by Commission: <br />Brauneis is in support of Live -Work. With the advent of smart homes and monitoring different <br />things, the water issue has the potential to provide the capability for people in these units to <br />have information come to them. At a minimum, if we can't cost effectively require separate <br />meters for two very different uses, we can require from a plumbing perspective that the two <br />different areas within a building can be sub -metered, not within the City purview but outside of <br />City purview, so the pipes are in place. Long term, we talk about Louisville having plenty of <br />water but when we're in a 10 year drought seen elsewhere in the country, it becomes a real <br />issue. With the growth of electronic smart homes, this is something to be made available with <br />minimal cost at this time. He thinks Live -Work makes a lot of sense. The question was raised <br />about why we want to tinker with this now? Actually, it goes back to 1967 when we tinkered <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).