Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 9, 2015 <br />Page 26 of 27 <br />an Opportunity to bring in more hotels? There are so many businesses in that area that attract <br />people from out of the area as well as a major hospital present. <br />Pritchard states their location along US 36 does not hurt. The view corridor from the highway is <br />highly valued. That was the original thought when they began clustering and building over 18 <br />years ago. Pritchard does not know if any hotels are coming into Superior. <br />O'Connell states this is an Opportunity because this is the only place to stay in Louisville. <br />Rice does not think that the citizens are a Constraint. The Constraint is the inability to drive <br />consensus. This process is about trying to develop consensus on how this corridor will be <br />developed. The citizens are an important resource to that whole discussion. He has attended <br />the meetings and has been amazed at the amount of participation that occurs. It is impressive. <br />Pritchard says he looks at their comments and they say "I want open space". <br />Moline says the Constraint could be along the lines of perception that vacant land is open <br />space. <br />Russell says referring back to South Boulder Road, there was talk about lack of community <br />consensus as a Constraint. It was much more about the intent of that corridor, walkability <br />versus traffic, and getting cars from one end to the other. It is a linear corridor. There is no <br />question about the traffic intent of McCaslin and what is happening in the "fatter" area around it. <br />How do we create a more vibrant community? Lack of common agreement on the purpose of <br />the corridor on South Boulder Road is a different issue than what we are encountering on <br />McCaslin. <br />Russell discusses the design of the parking lots and internal circulation on McCaslin. Curbs and <br />pavement and street are difficult to change. He says that ULI reports are always controversial. <br />He agrees that introducing a stronger grid in this area would be great, but it is an incredible <br />challenge. We are suggesting scraping significant public infrastructure. Perhaps this is <br />captured in "outdated site and building designs" as a Constraint. <br />Pritchard says the history of Centennial Valley was that it was supposed to be the location of the <br />mall. There is a "ring" design there. The problem with the Valley is it has always been an after- <br />thought. It was supposed to be something and then something else. They were trying to find <br />uses for it in this community. This is why there is a traffic issue. Trying to put in new streets <br />would be very expensive. <br />Moline says there have been comments about signage and does this fall into the "outdated site <br />and building designs"? <br />Pritchard says that signage has been updated and it has been an ongoing problem. Staff has <br />been making an effort to change and give exceptions. There are some new monument signs. <br />Much of the landscape installed in the past is now mature. Some vegetation has been removed <br />because buildings were not visible from the street. Pritchard agrees that signage is a Constraint. <br />Robinson says that Staff can add signage specifically to the Constraints. <br />O'Connell says that a Constraint could be that the entire west side of the corridor is bordered by <br />open space. Development is hemmed in by McCaslin on the east and Open Space on the west. <br />Robinson says they tried to capture that in Constraint "Market capture area limited by street, <br />network, regional competition, and open space". <br />