My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 04 23
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2015 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 04 23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:24:37 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:19:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
4/23/2015
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 23, 2015 <br />Page 2 of 23 <br />• Small Area Plan for South Boulder Road (SBR) extends from east city limits at Lafayette <br />to Via Appia on the west, from Fordyce Auto on Highway 42 on the north to city limits at <br />Paschal Drive on the north. <br />• Process has consisted of Five D process: <br />o Desire — Project principles and Measures of Success <br />o Discovery — Existing conditions, transportation, zoning yield, fiscal performance, <br />community character assessment <br />o Design — Three Alternatives, infrastructure, mixture of use, density, and form <br />o Discussion — Testing, transportation, zoning yield, fiscal performance, community <br />character, refine a preferred alternative <br />o Documentation — Final plan, zoning, implementation <br />• Staff needs Planning Commission endorsement of the Alternatives before vetting and <br />testing in Discussion phase. Need direction and recommendation to City Council. <br />Positive <br />Negative <br />Strengths Weaknesses <br />• Parks and open space near corridor • Pedestrian and bike connections are lacking, <br />City Physical form of the corridor (parcel sizes and uninviting, and perceived as unsafe <br />Control rights -of -way) • Conformity to community values <br />• Proximity to existing neighborhoods • Aesthetic appearance of corridor <br />• Connections to adjacent neighborhoods <br />Opportunities Threats <br />• Corridor as transportation link Impact of the market and regional competition <br />• Shops, businesses, and services on corridor on existing and desired land uses <br />Region Valuable mix of uses on corridor Traffic <br />Control Train noise and impacts <br />Lack of community consensus on purpose of corridor <br />• Upkeep of existing buildings <br />Study outcome — <br />o Defines desired land uses for the corridor <br />o Establishes preferred physical character <br />o Outlines public infrastructure priorities <br />Staff will present Alternatives which will test — <br />o Character and design of the development <br />o Changes to property rights <br />o Fiscal impacts <br />o Traffic impacts <br />o Public costs <br />o School impacts <br />o Evaluate against the Measures of Success <br />Scott Robinson, Planner II, presents from Power Point: <br />• Specific areas in the corridor with significant development potential, property values and <br />structure values indicate redevelopment likely in next 10-20 years <br />• Proposed Alternatives: Current Zoning, Workshop, Market, Survey <br />• Land use descriptions proposed - <br />o Mixed Use — Employment. This mix of uses creates a dense neighborhood with <br />walkable work places by mixing office or other commercial space with <br />residences. Office and residential/office, at least 60% office <br />o Mixed Use — General. By mixing office, retail, and residences, this category <br />aims to create the most walkable places to live, work, and shop. Retail and retail <br />and/or residential and/or office, at least 40% retail <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.