My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 04 23
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2015 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 04 23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:24:37 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:19:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
4/23/2015
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />April 23, 2015 <br />Page 6 of 23 <br />o Potential pedestrian underpass, running perpendicular to SBR. Underpass <br />located at corner of Centennial Avenue into park. <br />• Option 3a and 3b <br />o Realign Main Street and Rezone the property <br />0 17,000 sf of retail. Retail on ground floor, three stories, parking in front and back <br />o Creating a "hard corner" because aligning the road will improve access to retail <br />o Six residential units <br />o Pedestrian underpass. Pedestrian crosswalk could also be present but signal <br />would be for the train, not pedestrian. <br />Staff is requesting: <br />1. Confirm Land Use Alternatives to study <br />2. Confirm Main Street alignment options to study <br />What will be studied? <br />1. Character and design of the development <br />2. Changes to property rights <br />3. Fiscal impacts <br />4. Traffic impacts <br />5. Public costs <br />6. School impacts <br />7. Evaluated against the measures of success <br />Russell asks who has ultimate jurisdiction over SBR? <br />Russ answers the City of Louisville. It is not a county road or a state road. <br />Russell asks if we are contemplating changes in the cross section of the road itself? <br />Russ says in the infrastructure graphic, we recognize the physical constraints of SBR. It cannot <br />be a six -lane road without significant impacts up and down the entire corridor. We know we <br />need to address traffic. Much like the Highway 42 plan which would take out a tremendous <br />amount of open space for Miners Field and Little Italy, the community chose to keep the road <br />small and efficient, and add parallel network; then, try to improve the efficiency of Highway 42. <br />Staff is proposing this on SBR. If the Portal Apartments and Village Square Shopping Center <br />redevelop, Staff believes there is enough right-of-way to work with them to connect Garfield <br />Avenue to Alfalfa's. It lessens the traffic on Centennial Drive and lessens the impact on SBR. <br />The neighborhood north and west of Alfalfa's could drive down Garfield and turn on the new <br />road without getting on SBR. It would be done at the pace of land redevelopment. <br />The City is working with RTD to get increased headway on the DASH, and extend the 228 along <br />SBR. <br />The bike lanes are installed on SBR. There will be a parallel bicycle trail network outside of the <br />right-of-way. There is a good network on the north side that follows the Davidson Highline. It <br />breaks down at Via Appia. On the south side, there is a poor bicycle network parallel to SBR. <br />Using Cottonwood Park and Via Appia intersection, and piping the Goodhue Ditch at the <br />intersection, we are hoping to bring the bicycle trail up to Via Appia. <br />Rice asks procedural questions. He clarifies that we are looking at things to move them forward <br />for further study. <br />Russ says yes. <br />Rice says on page 5, Staff and consultants will develop traffic and fiscal analyses. What would <br />the fiscal analyses consist of? <br />Russ says on May 5, the next Council session, Staff is going to Council to adopt the new fiscal <br />impact model. It is a marginal cost model based on the City's level of service such as Park's <br />level of service, Open Space's level of service, and Police Department's level of service. Each <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.