My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 07 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2015 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 07 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:25:10 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:19:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
7/9/2015
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 9, 2015 <br />Page 3 of 17 <br />are 22 other parcels that are canvassed in this study including some on neighboring blocks. <br />How many of those parcels do not meet the criteria? <br />Robinson says the existing house will comply with the setback requirements. This drove the <br />location of the line. Robinson does not know how many parcels do not meet the criteria but <br />those that are about the same size or smaller probably would not meet them. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Andy Johnson, 920 Lincoln Avenue, Louisville, CO <br />DAJ Design located at 922A Main Street, Louisville, CO <br />This is an unusually sized lot in Old Town. It is a four -lot property, definitely unique for anywhere <br />in Old Town. To further clarify Commissioner Rice's question around the lot size and how the <br />dividing line was set, currently there is a house on the property. It is an older home and a <br />historic home. The desire is to keep the home. Landmarking is not being pursued at this time; <br />however, this is something that is an option for the future. The house would definitely be a <br />candidate. The idea is to try and keep reasonably -sized lots. Unfortunately, the house is not <br />centered in the four lots to the point where it cannot be subdivided and keep the house. We are <br />able to keep the house and reasonably have two sized lots compatible with the neighborhood. <br />Looking at the profile of Lafarge, it is a mix of two -lot properties and three -lot properties. There <br />are two three -lot properties located on the other side of Lafarge, one on the corner and one is <br />midblock. We did have a discussion at the BOA Meeting around the general profile of Old Town <br />and having a mix of different -sized lots. It seems that a four -lot property is unusually large. A <br />4,300 sf home is an unusually large home and it is certainly not out of the question that <br />someone would conceivably build that in the future if the property sold as one property. The two <br />three -lot properties both have newer homes and the likelihood of them changing is very small. <br />The idea is to set the property line 5' off of the most southern edge of the existing home. This is <br />what defined the property line. If you look at most double lot properties around Old Town, <br />typically they don't comply with the minimum standards. I think this was done intentionally so <br />that things like this would be reviewed and we can make intelligent decisions. The two <br />properties that would be created with the subdivision are reasonably -sized properties, giving the <br />corner lot a little more room because the setbacks are different, and a corner lot should have <br />more space. Adding another lot to Old Town is a small incremental change as opposed to some <br />of the developments being looked at in the near future such as DELO, Steel Ranch, and others <br />around town. This is a very small change. It has a lower impact on the school system and on the <br />neighborhood and traffic. The lot location being on Lafarge lends itself to having smaller <br />structures and smaller properties. Being buffered with larger properties around the area allows <br />this subdivision to work reasonably well. The home on the property is a historic home and it is <br />important to subdivide and save the home. <br />Karla Dakin, 1240 Lafarge Avenue, Louisville, CO <br />I have lived on this property since 1998. 1 raised my son here and have been a part of the <br />community for a long time. I have seen a lot of changes. When I bought the property, I bought it <br />with a Low Doc, No Doc loan and since then, this product is no longer available. I have been <br />unable to refinance which means I am past my flexible ARM and I am blessed that the interest <br />rates have been low so I can stay. Part of my impetus behind this was the ability to sell the lot <br />between myself and Chris and Terry and be able to stay in my home and refinance. The other <br />big piece for me that is critical is I am a Landscape Architect and I have never been able to <br />design my own garden. If you can see if you walk by, it is very much a case of the cobbler's <br />shoes. This would give me an opportunity to design a beautiful garden and take advantage of <br />everything on the north that up to this point, has been a vegetable garden and a wild and wooly <br />prairie. I work on this property. I have turned one of the little garages into my studio and I know <br />all of my neighbors. I would love to be able to stay here. This would be a great opportunity to <br />allow me to do that. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.