My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 08 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2015 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2015 08 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:25:21 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:19:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
8/13/2015
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />August 13, 2015 <br />Page 4 of 22 <br />Rice asks about the development standards. How do we enforce these? These are supposedly <br />the conditions by which this will be operated. Can the SRU be withdrawn? If the PC approves <br />the community garden, do the conditions become part of the approval? <br />McCartney says they will be enforced specifically by the garden association. The City's Code <br />Enforcement is complaint -driven so once a complaint is received, we can ascertain if the <br />complaint is from the development standards. The SRU can be brought back to the PC should <br />some of the standards not be met. The SRU Plan contains the conditions. <br />Russ says the City has received a $15,000 sustainability grant from Boulder County to help <br />implement it. The City will seek more funds if needed. There is a partnership between LSAB, <br />the garden association to be created, and the City of Louisville. The City will be installing the <br />irrigation system. There is a requirement for third party management. <br />Russell asks how the City came to own this land? Was it part of an open space acquisition? <br />McCartney says he does not know but he thinks it was part of an overall development plan <br />since this is typically how we acquire these. Staff did not do that research. <br />Russell asks if Parks and Open Space have an interest in this and have weighed in? <br />Russ says this was not presented to them. This is part of the same lot as Lawrence Enrietto <br />Park. It is not part of the Open Space network nor is it included in the Open Space Master Plan. <br />Russell talks about Sheet 1 of the submittal that includes an aerial with a site plan. Are notations <br />on the Submittal considered binding, specifically the notes of existing trees to remain? Does <br />this need to be included as an additional condition? <br />McCartney says it is part of the document and is a referral request from the City Manager's <br />office. <br />Russell talks about the sheds. Will they obstruct sight lines or create visibility problems? <br />McCartney says Staff will make sure that will not happen. <br />Tengler asks that since this is City property, if the PC approves this, is this effectively a right in <br />perpetuity? Will this become a permanent use or is there a time period? <br />McCartney says there is no time period associated with it. A SRU can be revoked. It will be <br />based on the development standards. Staff feels the community garden will be successful. <br />Tengler says from a timing standpoint, Staff noted it initially will be 25 plots on the east side of <br />Lincoln. What is the expectation for the other 20 plots on the west side? <br />Russ says based on floodplain impacts, Staff anticipates the west will be the first phase. <br />Tengler says that the Staff report on page 27 says "east". <br />McCartney says it was misrepresented. <br />Tengler asks in terms of the floodplain development that the Board of Adjustments (BOA) will <br />look at, what will they consider and what will they review? <br />McCartney said they will look at placement of the sheds since they will displace water. They <br />want to make sure they are placed appropriately should there be a flood event. There will be <br />anchoring of some type that will be required at time of construction. They will consider the "fill" if <br />soil is brought in. The infill could actually raise or impact the overall floodplain. Will there be an <br />adverse effect to affect anyone not in the floodplain or will it increase the floodplain? <br />Pritchard asks, in Staff's opinion, do you think the floodplain is the reason why there was no <br />other type of development such as additional senior housing? <br />McCartney says it could be and it probably played a big part. I do not know the development <br />history of this area. I suspect it played a strong part. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Mary Ann Heaney, 1117 Lafarge Avenue, Louisville, CO <br />Louisville Sustainability Advisory Committee (LSAB) member. Before this meeting, I went back <br />through my notes and dug out old emails. We started this process in March 2012. We spent a <br />tremendous amount of time doing research, trying to gauge citizen interest, and working with <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.