Planning Commission Minutes 2016 04 14

Home Browse Search

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes April 14, 2016 Page 15 of 19 what it is they are proposing. I wonder what does this accomplish? They have this change to the GDP but they still have to get a SRU to do it. I don't think we are accomplishing anything by approving this even if we were so inclined, which I'm not. I think if they want to do this, they should come in with all of it at the same time so we are not just considering changing the development plan or changing the GDP for a specific use. Moline asks staff if there is a procedural reason for there to be a separation of the two things. Trice says there doesn't need to be, but the applicant chose to do it this way. They wanted that guarantee before they submitted with the PUD and SRU. Hsu says I think if there is no reason that they couldn't present everything at one time, it seems that we should wait until there is an actual need. Then, we can see if it is compatible with residents' concerns and the CTC feel. The prudent thing would be to wait. Pritchard says I am hearing there is not a lot of support, if any support, for this motion. What I would suggest that we do is to continue this matter and Staff draw up with a Resolution of Denial and bring it back for an actual vote. I think Staff has enough information from the Commission as to why we would deny it. Motion made by Pritchard to continue this so Staff can draw up a Resolution of Denial, seconded by Moline. Motion passes by voice vote. ➢ Accessory Structure Setback LMC Amendment, Resolution No. 10, Series 2016. A resolution recommending approval of an ordinance amending Section 17.16.030 of the Louisville Municipal Code regarding accessory uses. • Staff member: Lauren Trice. Planner I Conflict of Interest and Disclosure: None. Public Notice Certification: Posted in City Hall, Public Library, Recreation Center, Courts and Police Building, and City Web -Site on April 8, 2016. Staff Report of Facts and Issues: Trice presented from Power Point: • PURPOSE. To reduce the setback requirements for smaller accessory structures such as storage sheds and play structures in residential zone districts. If approved, this ordinance would permit accessory structures that are less than 120 square feet to be located three feet from a side or rear property line in all residential zone districts. 35 3 8-15* 0-3** 50 20 40 10 50 20 40 10 50 15 40 10 50 15 40 10 40 5 30 10 35 5 25 10 50 15 40 10 40 10 30 10 35 5 25 10 35 5 25 10 35 5 25 10