My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2016 07 14
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2016 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2016 07 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:31:12 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:37:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/14/2016
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 14, 2016 <br />Page 15 of 33 <br />relocate them. You need to find nursery that has big trees. Without consulting our landscape <br />architect, my memory is that we can certainly get evergreens in the 12-15' high range without <br />too much effort. They might not be available in Colorado. The oak trees are certainly going to be <br />in that same neighborhood. <br />Hsu asks about the neighboring Balfour properties. They all have waivers for going over the 35' <br />maximum. Did any of those have accommodations like the eastern side where you tried to go <br />below 35' and the rest of it was above? <br />Schonbrun says with the exception of the cottages which line 95t" Street as part of the Lodge <br />building, every other building that has been built in the Alvenus Park subdivision has been well <br />above 35'. <br />Williams says other than maybe one little corner of the Lodge, they all go to three stories or, in <br />two cases, four stories all around the building. There is no stepping down to speak of in those <br />other locations. <br />Tengler says there are 350 current employees at Balfour. What do you anticipate the new <br />building will bring? <br />Schonbrun says the total number of employees there will probably be 35. The daytime shift is <br />obviously the largest. We would expect 20 or so at that point. The evening shift is probably 15. <br />The overnight shift is probably 5 to 8. In terms of parking, there is a transition period where we <br />think the number spots we have will be sufficient even during the overlap in the change in shifts. <br />Public Comment: <br />Natasha Bond, 1841 Sweet Clover Lane, Louisville, CO <br />I am one of the properties that backs up to the planned development. I am here to express <br />some significant concerns about the PUD application. In the words of the great Dr. Seuss, I am <br />the Lorax and I am here to speak for the trees. We have heard a lot this evening about trees. As <br />you may be aware, adjacent to the planned development are two large, very old cottonwoods in <br />the drainage area. The area is also inhabited by a surprising large range of wildlife. The cotton- <br />woods are shallow -rooted trees and according to the University of California, Berkeley, there is <br />an anticipated required root protection zone of 2-3 times the diameter of the canopy of those <br />trees in order to adequately protect their longstanding livelihood from construction. I do not <br />believe that the current development has allowed for that zoning and gives them enough space. <br />We have heard this evening of the plan to preserve the existing smaller cottonwoods (when I <br />say smaller, I do think they are more like 25' tall), along the north and east side of the <br />developments. Those additionally will require the same root protection zone. I did not see that <br />on the plans presented this evening. Therefore, I propose that the planned construction is not <br />protecting the trees. It is merely leaving them there to be damaged and later removed. If Balfour <br />genuinely intends to protect those trees, I suggest they give them the space they need <br />biologically. We have also heard a lot this evening about the plan for mature planting. Again, <br />according to the University of California, Berkeley, and substantiated by the website of <br />SaveaTree.com which is a well -established industry organization, a mature tree is one over 10 <br />years of age and having a 6' diameter trunk. There are a couple of problems with mature <br />planting. Firstly, mature trees do not transplant well. It is extremely difficult to uproot, move, and <br />replant a tree of that size without disturbing their root ball. To the extent, Save A Tree says "the <br />transplanting of mature trees causes growth retardation in the majority of cases, often affecting <br />tree growth for up to 20 years". It means that if we do plant trees of 12' to 15' height, it could <br />well be two generations before those trees are actually screening the property in the way we <br />have seen in the images. This brings me to my final point which is that of privacy. I actually think <br />the Louisville City Council does an excellent job of treading the balance between allowing the <br />area to develop and grow and maintaining a very rural feel. The privacy of my home, access to <br />the very peaceful trails around Hecla, the unimpeded views of the Flatirons, and the <br />convenience of living in a city such as Louisville and the neighborhood is something I put a huge <br />value on. The planned Balfour building will significantly impact the privacy of my home and <br />those of my neighbors. As I shown with the lack of planting and the lack of the proper protection <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.