My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2016 07 14
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2016 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2016 07 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:31:12 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:37:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/14/2016
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 14, 2016 <br />Page 29 of 33 <br />Commission Questions of Staff. <br />Moline asks about parking issue and the money the applicant can contribute into the City <br />parking fund. How does that translate into creating more parking and City parking issues? <br />Robinson says the money can go towards acquiring parking elsewhere in downtown which the <br />City is actively pursuing. The property at the corner of Elma and Front has recently been paved <br />and is public parking. Once the South Street Underpass is finished (it is under construction now <br />with BNSF), the City has acquired land on the other side for public parking. <br />Rice says am I correct that there is no waiver being sought. <br />Robinson says no waiver is being sought; just a request to pay parking fee -in -lieu instead of <br />providing parking. <br />Rice says the controversy is whether we make them pay for six or seven parking spaces. The <br />Special Review Use is for the outdoor dining. If memory serves me right, what caused the <br />proposal to be denied last time was the waivers being sought. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Eric Hartronft, 950 Spruce Street, Suite 2A, Louisville, CO <br />Not all of you were here when we presented in November. As was pointed out, the last proposal <br />looked at a 35' building, but there were three stories. The transition area of Downtown Louisville <br />guidelines states that buildings should be no more than two stories, 35'. We are coming back <br />with a two story building that does not exceed 35'. The area that is up to 35' is a small area for a <br />stair tower to get to the roof. The building as you see it is lower than 35'. The gables are <br />probably 32' to 33'. <br />The site is across the street from the Louisville Museum and is a different part of town than <br />other areas that are more active. One thing about this area from a retail standpoint is that some <br />businesses have suffered in the northern part of the 900 block because of the lack of foot traffic <br />How do we make downtown as vibrant as we can? Rhonda and Nancy have come forward with <br />this site because it is a keystone piece for downtown to welcome people in. It is a gateway, not <br />only from the Main Street traffic driving south but also from the new traffic coming through the <br />underpass. It is at a crossroads and is an important piece. <br />Design Drivers <br />• Significant Gateway to Downtown <br />• Address the corner — from north Main Street and east <br />• Provide rich pedestrian experience <br />• Opportunities for outdoor dining and "hang out" <br />• Accommodate owner's business <br />• Provide opportunity for new Main Street business <br />• Maintain the existing house if possible <br />• Relate to surrounding residential and commercial <br />• Respect Old Town and Downtown Design Guidelines <br />We have eliminated the third floor where Rhonda and Nancy wanted to live. Without the third <br />floor, we cannot accommodate the loft. They will continue to use the residence on site as a <br />rental property. We looked at the possibility of taking down the existing house on the property, <br />but there are reasons to leave it. It helps to transition into the neighborhood from the site. The <br />Historic Preservation aspect of the house is important. It is not our most historic residence in <br />town, but it is a piece of our historic fabric. When you look at Old Town, this house fits in. It has <br />some unique character. The owners have decided it is desirable to keep the house instead of <br />putting more parking there. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.