My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Minutes 2016 07 14
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2016 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Minutes 2016 07 14
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2020 1:31:12 PM
Creation date
7/9/2020 11:37:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/14/2016
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 14, 2016 <br />Page 32 of 33 <br />Public Comment: <br />Michael Menaker, 1827 Choke Cherry Drive, Louisville, CO <br />Very quickly on the parking. There are plans to redo the parking lot at South Street to the east <br />when the South Street Gateway Underpass under the railroad tracks opens. That street went <br />one way for those with short memories when we built the new library. It was a construction <br />mitigation design issue. It was really supposed to be reversed once the library was built. We <br />have been challenged to get that to execute. We are promised that it will go back to a two-way <br />street with parking on both sides of the street, probably still angled, when the Gateway is done. <br />That opens up a lot of parking because those spaces are rarely full during the day because they <br />are not apparently assessable. There is also some consideration about redoing South Street to <br />the west to provide more parking with angled parking, but also to put in a bike corridor that will <br />connect to existing bikeways in the City. When you look at it all in mass, add to that the newly <br />acquired paved parking and the recently announced acquisition by the City of Blue Parrot's <br />parking lot which now, once again, reopens a discussion on structured parking on land that the <br />City controls. I see no reason to be overly concerned about the parking impacts on the least <br />busy end of Downtown corridor. I am intrigued and supportive of the outdoor dining which I think <br />will provide a restaurant anchor and allow traffic to flow. Compared to where this project was <br />before, this new design answers many of the concerns this Commission had. Even in its <br />previous incarnation, I am reminded there was tremendous support from the neighbors and <br />business community. The Chamber was here in force and other business owners up and down <br />the street were here in force. Eric did this to answer the height modifications in that dwelling unit <br />on the top. I see no reason for you to not approve this unanimously. <br />Summary and request by Staff and Applicant: <br />Staff recommends Planning Commission move to approve 824 South Street Final PUD: <br />Resolution 18, Series 2016. A resolution recommending approval of a Planned Unit <br />Development (PUD) and Special Review Use (SRU) to allow for the remodel of the existing <br />house, and outdoor sales at 824 South Street. <br />with two conditions: <br />1. The access area for the handicap parking space shall be moved on to the property <br />2. The items outlined in the Public Works memo dated June 23, 2016 shall be satisfied <br />before recordation of the PUD. <br />Applicant has nothing to add. <br />Closed Public Hearing and discussion by Commission: <br />Rice says the only issue in my mind is how we deal with the handicapped parking spot. I have <br />listened to both sides of the discussion and I find both of them to have merit and I haven't <br />decided which way to go. <br />Hsu says I agree with what Tom said. That area, I agree, is easier to park on. It is on the north <br />side and usually, you can find parking pretty easily a block or so away. I don't know which way <br />that swings the consideration, whether having more parking available means that we should <br />move the handicapped space. We could take away one parking space as one way to read it. If <br />this becomes a more thriving part of Downtown, then maybe we do need more parking in that <br />area. <br />O'Connell says because I am not sure, I am in favor of the way Eric proposes it. If it turns out to <br />be a nightmare, then we can always come back and make them change it. <br />Moline says I agree with Ann on this. I am compelled by the things Eric mentioned. I think it is <br />great to have a space that can have some dual uses, be it sidewalk but also be used for ADA <br />access when that occasionally happens. It seems like a great way to get another parking space <br />right Downtown where people are going to want it. I am in support of the applicant's proposed <br />modified condition. I think the building will be a great asset to Main Street. I think you have done <br />a wonderful job. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.