Planning Commission Minutes 2016 08 11

Home Browse Search

Davidson Mesa Open Space •• a i .• ry e• C Planning Commission Meeting Minutes August 11, 2016 Page 9 of 29 ,q'7,.�� - •.� Urban Design Plan sp rU&� �. • ^: The urban design plan is a conceptual • r% � I. - llludration of how the corridor could develop r . under this plan_ If inciides slowed land uses as well as footprints for existing, plan red, Maw and conceptual future buildings. The n t sig niAcont change in land use is the (? allowance of residentioI as a special review ,-1 use along the east edge of the study area. r The plan also includes transportation and pede Irian improvements further detailed on follohenng pages. Thts mop and the maps and lILMrctions that Follow are conceptual and not intended to show the exact bcotions or designs of improvements. Some areas in the Drigind study ores, an as Killsborogh West, . h b d from theW It have ��• 'LEI AV remove m p n area. .s recommended these areas be left —fly as they are, with detailed recommendations to come from the neighborhood plo nning process. ■ Retail/Office ■ Retail/Office/Residential ■ Otte. ■ Residential High Density ■ Residential Medium Density ■ Park ■ Open Space Blue: Office in Centennial Valley Red: General commercial, allowing both retail and office along McCaslin Orange: Retail/Office/Residential Parcel O, Sam's Club site Centennial Valley Center Even if Orange is approved and if and when the property owner wants to redevelop, it would go through a re -zoning process. The City will not come in and evict these businesses, and then build apartments. This is also only allowing this through Special Review Use (SRU). It must be appropriate for the site. At the last meeting, the PC asked for results from the city-wide Community Survey done every four years. There were two questions asked about residential in the McCaslin Blvd area. It asked about three types of residential housing — senior housing, multifamily housing, and low- income housing. While there is support for all three types, there are also quite a few people who strongly oppose all three types. It is something we have seen throughout the plan process; the divided opinion on whether to allow residential, what type of residential, where to allow it, and if it is allowed in the corridor. If residential is to be allowed in the McCaslin area, should it be adjacent to existing residential development. In the draft plan, it allows residential through re- zoning and SRU, but only adjacent to the existing residential. It does not allow it in the Colony Square area. If PC and CC want to see it there, Staff can re-evaluate it. Staff wanted to present a draft that is consistent with the adopted Comp Plan and the direction received three years ago when it was adopted.