Laserfiche WebLink
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 13, 2016 <br />Page 2 of 31 <br />Public Notice Certification: <br />Published in the Boulder Daily Camera on September 25, 2016. Posted in City Hall, Public <br />Library, Recreation Center, and the Courts and Police Building, and mailed to surrounding <br />property owners on September 23, 2016. <br />Staff Report of Facts and Issues: <br />Robinson presented from Power Point: <br />• Located in CTC <br />• Property zone Planned Community Zone District -Industrial (PCZD-1) <br />• Required to follow IDDSG <br />• Located at the corner of 10411 Street and Dogwood Street <br />• Proposed 6,267 SF refrigerator on the back of the building <br />• Does not impact landscaping or parking, meets both requirements <br />• Adequate parking based on current uses <br />• Adequate separation to provide vehicular access <br />• Addition will be 37' tall which is taller than the existing buildings, but under the maximum <br />allowed height of 40' in the IDDSG <br />• Exterior will be stucco to match the existing building and made of an insulating material <br />Staff Recommendations: <br />Staff recommends Planning Commission move to approve 197 S 104' PUD Amendment, <br />Resolution 21, Series 2016. A resolution recommending approval of an amendment to the final <br />Planned Unit Development (PUD) plan for Lots 2A & 3A, Block 4, Business Center at CTC to <br />construct a 6,267 SF addition. <br />Commission Questions of Staff. <br />Rice asks if there are any waivers being sought. Robinson says no. <br />Hsu says "the proposed addition lacks architectural detailing, but given its size and location on <br />the lot, Staff has determined it complies with the standards of the IDDSG". The IDDSG sets a <br />standard to avoid blank walls at ground level. Does this comply and if it doesn't, isn't this a <br />waiver? <br />Robinson says the IDDSG makes a distinction between the public zone and the nonpublic <br />zone. There is a higher architectural standard in the public zone which is the area abutting <br />public streets. Given this addition's location in the back of the building and setback from the <br />south lot line from Dogwood Street, it is considered in the nonpublic zone and considered the <br />back of the building which does not have those same requirements for visual interest. It is <br />relatively small and is creating more articulation by having this addition stick out. Staff believes it <br />complies with the IDDSG. <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Jerry Moore, JM Associates, 589 Arapahoe Street, Boulder, CO <br />I am the architect and planner for this project. I will not make a presentation because the <br />agenda this evening is long. We concur with Staff's review and their conclusions. I will be happy <br />to address questions. <br />Commission Questions of Applicant: <br />Brauneis asks if you are at liberty to discuss why this is a large freezer. <br />Moore says the prime tenant in the building just to the north in the same PUD is Udi's Foods. <br />They are expanding. This is a new division they are adding to their business and they need the <br />freezer space. When the space is ready, they will be expanding into 80% of this building as well. <br />Public Comment: None. <br />