My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 08 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2020 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 08 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2020 11:35:41 AM
Creation date
8/13/2020 8:25:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
8/13/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 25, 2020 <br />Page 21 of 24 <br />foot sidewalk for ADA requirements. There is just not enough buildable area left to do <br />that design. <br />Moline asks if there is a way to reduce in some spots the trail corridor. <br />Rhymer speaks about the grading restraints that exist and how because of that, the site <br />would not allow what Commissioner Moline is suggesting. <br />Turner shows a visual to the commissioners of the comparison of the 55 and 60 foot <br />setback line. <br />Public Comment: <br />Barbara Parnell, 1534 White Violet Way <br />Parnell expresses a concern about this development being the gateway into Louisville. <br />She believes this location is one of the most beautiful entries into the city. She is also <br />concerned about sustainability and does not understand the concept of drive by retail. <br />She does not feel like that would add anything to the city. She wonders if the city can <br />buy this land if the property is so hard to develop on, then the community could decide <br />what kind of development is needed there. She says she would like to see a <br />development that is more walkable and less vehicle dependent. Her husband works in <br />the CTC area and he does not envision himself using the suggested type of retail. She <br />would like to see retail that is more community chosen. <br />Closinq Statement by Staff. <br />Ritchie addresses Commissioner Moline's question about if there is a way to reduce in <br />some areas the trail corridor. She mentions that this has been reviewed by the public <br />works staff and we both agree that the grading as it relates to the trail is already pretty <br />developed. What we do not agree on is the requirement for the 185 foot depth as well <br />as the truck bay depth that the applicant is requesting. This would be the deepest truck <br />bay design in relation to the CTC area. <br />Howe asks what the setback is for the McCaslin Market Place. <br />Ritchie says the setback between the parking area and the right of way is 23.2 feet. <br />The setback from the property line to the building face is 96.6 feet. <br />Closing Statement by Applicant. - <br />Rhymer speaks on the 60 foot building and parking setback, states that it is a big deal <br />to this development, and is most likely a deal breaker for them. She says they have <br />squeezed this down as much as possible with the minimum depth. She feels strongly <br />that they can still provide a quality development that can meet and exceed the <br />commercial design standard requirements if they could only be held to that instead of <br />the outdated 2004 GDP document. <br />Turner speaks on the 130 foot depth. The truck turning radius exhibit that was shown <br />earlier is very important in our experience that there is the space and capacity for large <br />semi -trucks that give them enough room. It is already constrained with the detention <br />and the configuration of the site being narrower on the north end. From their <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.