My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 08 13
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2020 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2020 08 13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2020 11:35:41 AM
Creation date
8/13/2020 8:25:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
8/13/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
253
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 25, 2020 <br />Page 6 of 24 <br />General Development Plan Conditions <br />o Lower transmission poles adjacent to Rockcress Drive <br />o Address outstanding public works comments on the drainage and utility <br />plan <br />o Add a note to the GDP requiring each PUD application to demonstrate <br />acceptable roadway capacity before the development can proceed <br />o Require authorization on the intersection improvements outside of the city <br />o Add a GDP requirement on concurrent employment and commercial <br />development with residential development <br />Concurrency Requirements <br />o 600 Units of residential development on Parcel A are allowed with the first <br />phase of corporate campus development on Parcel B. All phases of the <br />residential development allowed on Parcel A following completion of all <br />phases of corporate campus development on Parcel B <br />o Limit residential development on Parcels C and D to 300 units until <br />1,500,000 sq. ft. of commercial development, inclusive of 25,000 sq. ft. of <br />retail development is achieved in the GDP Planning Area <br />Commissioner Questions of Staff: <br />Diehl mentions that the traffic study shows daily trips at the full build out would be <br />27,000. Where are we today in terms of daily trips? <br />Zuccaro asks for Rich Fulmer, the city's engineering consultant, or Public Works to <br />answer this question because he does not have that data available to him. <br />Zuccaro gives an answer from one the commissioner's earlier questions to Bise. He <br />says the average annual surplus would cover a third of the existing city debt service <br />payments. <br />Fulmer says that the applicant provided a traffic study that mentions it would be 9,000 <br />trips per day to upwards of approximately 25,000 trips per day. That will be spread out <br />through all hours of the day and there are four enter/exit locations for vehicles for this <br />development. He mentions that the traffic will be distributed and is not all in one <br />location. <br />Diehl states that the 27,000 trips are supposed to reference the traffic coming in and <br />out of the area versus an additional 27,000 trips in and around Louisville. Is there any <br />way to quantify the increase of traffic in Louisville? <br />Fulmer says that as traffic engineers, we try to concentrate on a specific roadway <br />intersection, but you are adding those 27,000 trips in Louisville. <br />Moline asks how the capacity of Highway 36's interchange compares to McCaslin <br />Blvd's interchange. <br />Fulmer says he is unsure if he can do a very good comparison, but mentions that <br />improvements will need to be made at that interchange at some time. There have not <br />been studies to determine what those improvements will be. That interchange will be at <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.