My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Recreation Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2020 07 27
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
>
2020 Recreation Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Recreation Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2020 07 27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2020 11:38:29 AM
Creation date
8/13/2020 8:29:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
7/27/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Recreation Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />March 18, 2019 <br />Page 2of3 <br />Staff Updates <br />Recreational Facility Use Policy <br />Kathy Martin and Nathan Mosely presented a draft of a policy, asked for by <br />the Board, that prioritizes use of all indoor and outdoor recreation facilities. This <br />led to a discussion of where drop -ins fit vis-a-vis non -profits, for -profits, BVSD, <br />residents, non-residents, etc. Christin Heuston felt there was a need for a <br />statement of an overall guiding principle. Specific discussions of pool and tennis <br />court use, among others, led to the conclusion that the draft would be re -worked <br />with an eye to having differing priorities for different activities within an over- <br />arching theme of inclusion. <br />Outdoor Recreation Amenities Update <br />Nathan Mosely asked for any input to the draft report. He noted that the report <br />would be used by contractors as a basis of discussion. It was suggested that <br />input be obtained, regarding the Cottonwood Park project, from residents of <br />nearby apartments and the trailer park, among others. <br />Golf Course CIP and Operational Budgets <br />David Baril and David Dean reviewed the CIP proposals in detail, by year. A <br />highlight was a comparative drawn between the (very small) size of the <br />clubhouse and storage facilities when compared with competitors. <br />It was noted that bids for the golf carts are in, and that outside funding was <br />being sought to offset the cost of relining the pond at hole 11. Rich Bradfield <br />asked whether or not all Golf Course CIP's are annually funded. The response <br />was that a reserve fund was supposed to be established, but was not, so annual <br />transfers are needed. It is clear to everyone on the Board and Staff that this is <br />not the best method for assuring that the needs of the golf course are met. <br />Recreational Facility CIP and Operational Budgets <br />Kathy Martin noted that while depreciation provides a reserve fund for the <br />Recreation and Senior Center, it does not cover all costs. She cited the hundred <br />thousand dollars needed for athletic field maintenance as an example. Rich <br />Bradfield asked about progress regarding the front doors. Kathy Martin noted that <br />meetings are occurring to discuss their improvement. Audrey DeBarros asked if <br />access to a mechanical valve in the regular gym storage area could be looked <br />into from a safety perspective. Kathy Martin will look into it. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.