My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2020 08 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
2020 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Agenda and Packet 2020 08 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2020 3:05:01 PM
Creation date
8/17/2020 5:52:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
8/19/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Board of Adjustment <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 17, 2020 <br />Page 7 of 10 <br />Gardner says she has lived in this neighborhood for over 15 years. She wanted to live <br />in this neighborhood because of its character and she supports the applicant's proposal. <br />She feels like although they are expanding the footprint, it is not changing the character <br />of the neighborhood. She respects them for trying to maintain the character of the <br />neighborhood. <br />Kim Contini, 1057 Century Dr <br />Contini notes that the applicants wants to keep raising their family in this home and is <br />in support of that. Their variance request is reasonable and enhances their quality of <br />life. She asks the board to allow them to live in their dream. She supports their proposal. <br />Tanya Kouyoumdjian, 106 Rose St <br />Kouyoumdjian points out that she just recently bought her home in Louisville because <br />she wanted a single story house and this neighborhood has that same character she <br />was looking for. She does not think the look of the neighborhood will change because <br />the design will be on the back of the property. Being at the back of property will keep it <br />looking hidden. She hopes that the board will allow the applicants to add on to the back <br />of their home. <br />Jodie Blanchard, 640 Sagebrush Dr <br />Blanchard mentions that the applicant went to elementary school with numerous <br />families that lived in Louisville. The kids he went to school with no longer live in <br />Louisville because they cannot afford it. The applicant's proposal would allow them to <br />stay in this home. She mentions that she thinks people will start tearing down homes <br />that are in this neighborhood if they cannot add on to their property. She gives credit to <br />the applicant for wanting to maintain the house's character. She also points out that <br />when the applicant showed homes that are in the Old Town Overlay zone district during <br />their presentation, they only showed homes with main level footprints. They were not <br />looking at the total square footage of the property. <br />Pam Foster, 107 Rose St <br />Foster says that the applicant has been very considerate of the existing architecture of <br />the home and wanting to maintain that architecture. She does not think their design <br />affects the character of the neighborhood. Modern families cannot fit into many of these <br />homes in Louisville and this proposal would allow their family to stay at this location, <br />where they have existing history in Louisville. <br />Summary and request by Staff and Applicant. - <br />Blanchard expresses gratitude and thankfulness for all the public comment they have <br />received. <br />Discussion by Board: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.