My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2020 09 08
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
UTILITY COMMITTEE (pka: Water Committee)
>
2020 Utility Committee Agendas and Packets
>
Utility Committee Agenda and Packet 2020 09 08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/14/2020 12:20:16 PM
Creation date
9/9/2020 3:31:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
9/8/2020
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council Utility Committee <br />Meeting Minutes <br />Tuesday, August 11, 2020 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />3. Do we make the 2.5M investment (Windy Gap) <br />4. Cash Reserves <br />Mr. Peterson said he ran the model to reduce the cash reserves to 25% <br />or 90 days and the smoothing rate would go from 4% to 3.7%. <br />Councilmember Lipton stated we aren't ready to make that type of policy <br />decisions right now then asked if they can bring back to us the historical <br />rate data (3-5 years). Mayor Pro Tern Councilmember Maloney noted that <br />it would be good to see the impact so we can decide if it's a policy we <br />want to bring up. Mr. Peterson did say he does have that information <br />which is in 2016 water increased 13%, 2017 was zero, 2018 was 3% and <br />2019-20 was zero. Mayor Stolzmann added that we don't have to model <br />all the money in the first year and said she'd be interested in seeing what <br />the rates would be modeled over the years they actually make the <br />payments in. Then see the tap fees recognized in the year that they were <br />received and see the 25% instead of the 30% on the reserves to see that <br />scenario. Mr. Kowar said we can do that as we continue to align with the <br />budget. Mrs. Balser commented that the reason we are here now is <br />because there was discussion that this needed to sync with the budget <br />and that is why we are having these discussions earlier. Committee <br />agreed to schedule another meeting so they get a better understanding <br />and so they and council have the benefit of seeing what the rate increase <br />has been in the last 3 years. Mayor Pro Tem Councilmember Maloney <br />stated he doesn't want to see CIP money removed. Councilmember <br />Fahey agreed and said she thinks we need to maintain existing projects <br />and rates should be based on the projects. <br />• Page 21-28 — Wastewater, Mr. Peterson said the driver for the wastewater fund <br />is farther out than water at around 2029-2030. He said there is only one large <br />project that is critical and is what's driving the 4.5% increase. <br />Page 30-36 — Stormwater, this is where we are below our target reserves with <br />spending and making sure it all lines up. Mr. Peterson said we are using our <br />combined utility fund in this instance. We are showing the large projects <br />(Cottonwood Park and Drainageway 7-1) as being spent in 2021 which brings <br />down cash reserves. Mr. Peterson said the stormwater is a very low fee and not <br />a lot of income on this. Committee accepted the recommendations and no other <br />questions. <br />Councilmember Lipton concluded and highlights what is desired for the next <br />meeting: <br />1. Analysis on three policy issues <br />2. Table of utility increases for past 3-4 years <br />3. Cash Reserves <br />4. Tap Fees <br />5. Windy Gap <br />6. Comparison of other municipalities <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.